Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26907187›Full record

ArticleThorax2016

Mind the gap: TB trends in the USA and the UK, 2000-2011.

Chimeremma D Nnadi, Laura F Anderson, Lori R Armstrong, Helen R Stagg, Debora Pedrazzoli, Robert Pratt, Charles M Heilig, Ibrahim Abubakar, Patrick K Moonan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Finding and Closing the Gaps in the Tuberculosis Elimination Campaign.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sexual dimorphism in bacterial infections.Biology of sex differences · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chimeremma D NnadiEpidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Laura F AndersonTuberculosis Section, Public Health England, London, UK.
Lori R ArmstrongDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Helen R StaggResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Debora PedrazzoliTB Modelling Group, TB Centre and CMMID, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London, UK.
Robert PrattDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Charles M HeiligDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ibrahim AbubakarTuberculosis Section, Public Health England, London, UK Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Patrick K MoonanDivision of Tuberculosis Elimination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Department of Health SRF-2011-04-001Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTB remains a major public health concern, even in low-incidence countries like the USA and the UK. Over the last two decades, cases of TB reported in the USA have declined, while they have increased substantially in the UK. We examined factors associated with this divergence in TB trends between the two countries.

methodsWe analysed all cases of TB reported to the US and UK national TB surveillance systems from 1 January 2000 through 31 December 2011. Negative binominal regression was used to assess potential demographic, clinical and risk factor variables associated with differences in observed trends.

findingsA total of 259,609 cases were reported. From 2000 to 2011, annual TB incidence rates declined from 5.8 to 3.4 cases per 100,000 in the USA, whereas in the UK, TB incidence increased from 11.4 to 14.4 cases per 100,000. The majority of cases in both the USA (56%) and the UK (64%) were among foreign-born persons. The number of foreign-born cases reported in the USA declined by 15% (7731 in 2000 to 6564 in 2011) while native-born cases fell by 54% (8442 in 2000 to 3883 in 2011). In contrast, the number of foreign-born cases reported in the UK increased by 80% (3380 in 2000 to 6088 in 2011), while the number of native-born cases remained largely unchanged (2158 in 2000 to 2137 in 2011). In an adjusted negative binomial regression model, significant differences in trend were associated with sex, age, race/ethnicity, site of disease, HIV status and previous history of TB (p<0.01). Among the foreign-born, significant differences in trend were also associated with time since UK or US entry (p<0.01).

interpretationTo achieve TB elimination in the UK, a re-evaluation of current TB control policies and practices with a focus on foreign-born are needed. In the USA, maintaining and strengthening control practices are necessary to sustain the progress made over the last 20 years.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsAdultFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPopulation SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTuberculosisTuberculosis, PulmonaryUnited KingdomUnited StatesClinical EpidemiologyTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID26907187
PMCPMC4792718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.