Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26906630›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Health characteristics and consultation patterns of people with intellectual disability: a cross-sectional database study in English general practice.

Iain M Carey, Sunil M Shah, Fay J Hosking, Stephen DeWilde, Tess Harris, Carole Beighton, Derek G Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Chronic disease management in patients with intellectual disabilities: a matched study in Dutch general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iain M CareyPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London.
Sunil M ShahPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London.
Fay J HoskingPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London.
Stephen DeWildePopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London.
Tess HarrisPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London.
Carole BeightonFaculty of Heath Social Care and Education, Kingston and St George's, University of London, London.
Derek G CookPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London.

Funding

Department of Health 12/64/154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with intellectual disability (ID) are a group with high levels of healthcare needs; however, comprehensive information on these needs and service use is very limited.

aimTo describe chronic disease, comorbidity, disability, and general practice use among people with ID compared with the general population. DESIGN AND

settingThis study is a cross-sectional analysis of a primary care database including 408 English general practices in 2012.

methodA total of 14 751 adults with ID, aged 18-84 years, were compared with 86 221 age-, sex- and practice-matched controls. Depending on the outcome, prevalence (PR), risk (RR), or odds (OR) ratios comparing patients with ID with matched controls are shown.

resultsPatients with ID had a markedly higher prevalence of recorded epilepsy (18.5%, PR 25.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.29 to 27.57), severe mental illness (8.6%, PR 9.10, 95% CI = 8.34 to 9.92), and dementia (1.1%, PR 7.52, 95% CI = 5.95 to 9.49), as well as moderately increased rates of hypothyroidism and heart failure (PR>2.0). However, recorded prevalence of ischaemic heart disease and cancer was approximately 30% lower than the general population. The average annual number of primary care consultations was 6.29 for patients with ID, compared with 3.89 for matched controls. Patients with ID were less likely to have longer doctor consultations (OR 0.73, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.77), and had lower continuity of care with the same doctor (OR 0.77, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.82).

conclusionCompared with the general population, people with ID have generally higher overall levels of chronic disease and greater primary care use. Ensuring access to high-quality chronic disease management, especially for epilepsy and mental illness, will help address these greater healthcare needs. Continuity of care and longer appointment times are important potential improvements in primary care.

Indexed as

General PracticeReferral and ConsultationActivities of Daily LivingAdultChronic DiseaseComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceUnited Kingdomchronic diseasecontinuity of careintellectual disabilitylearning disabilitiesprimary care

Identifiers

PMID26906630
PMCPMC4809710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.