Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26906421›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell science2016

DICER, DROSHA and DNA damage response RNAs are necessary for the secondary recruitment of DNA damage response factors.

Sofia Francia, Matteo Cabrini, Valentina Matti, Amanda Oldani, Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cells · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding the Dosage-Dependent Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sofia FranciaIFOM Foundation - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Via Adamello 16, Milan 20139, Italy Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGM-CNR), Via Abbiategrasso 207, Pavia 27100, Italy sofia.francia@ifom.eu fabrizio.dadda@ifom.eu.
Matteo CabriniIstituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGM-CNR), Via Abbiategrasso 207, Pavia 27100, Italy.
Valentina MattiIFOM Foundation - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Via Adamello 16, Milan 20139, Italy.
Amanda OldaniIFOM Foundation - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Via Adamello 16, Milan 20139, Italy.
Fabrizio d'Adda di FagagnaIFOM Foundation - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Via Adamello 16, Milan 20139, Italy Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IGM-CNR), Via Abbiategrasso 207, Pavia 27100, Italy sofia.francia@ifom.eu fabrizio.dadda@ifom.eu.
Istituto di Genetica Molecolare · ITFIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology · IT

Funding

Worldwide Cancer Research 14-1331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) plays a central role in preserving genome integrity. Recently, we reported that the endoribonucleases DICER and DROSHA contribute to DDR activation by generating small non-coding RNAs, termed DNA damage response RNA (DDRNA), carrying the sequence of the damaged locus. It is presently unclear whether DDRNAs act by promoting the primary recognition of DNA lesions or the secondary recruitment of DDR factors into cytologically detectable foci and consequent signal amplification. Here, we demonstrate that DICER and DROSHA are dispensable for primary recruitment of the DDR sensor NBS1 to DNA damage sites. Instead, the accumulation of the DDR mediators MDC1 and 53BP1 (also known as TP53BP1), markers of secondary recruitment, is reduced in DICER- or DROSHA-inactivated cells. In addition, NBS1 (also known as NBN) primary recruitment is resistant to RNA degradation, consistent with the notion that RNA is dispensable for primary recognition of DNA lesions. We propose that DICER, DROSHA and DDRNAs act in the response to DNA damage after primary recognition of DNA lesions and, together with γH2AX, are essential for enabling the secondary recruitment of DDR factors and fuel the amplification of DDR signaling.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA DamageDNA RepairHistonesHumansNuclear ProteinsRibonuclease IIIRibonuclease, PancreaticRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingTrans-ActivatorsTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDICER1 protein, humanDROSHA protein, humanH2AX protein, humanHistonesMDC1 protein, humanNBN protein, humanNuclear ProteinsRibonuclease IIIRibonuclease, PancreaticRNA, Small InterferingTP53BP1 protein, humanTrans-ActivatorsTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1DICERDNA damage responseDROSHANon-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID26906421
PMCPMC4852722
OpenAlexW2320807456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.