Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26906169›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Intra-articular facet joint injections for low back pain: a systematic review.

Rajni Vekaria, Ree'thee Bhatt, David R Ellard, Nicholas Henschke, Martin Underwood, Harbinder Sandhu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04822753 (A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Platelet Rich Plasma), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04822753 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) for Facet Mediated Lumbar Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomack Army Medical CenterRan2021 to 2025Enrolled91ConditionsFacet Joint Pain, Low Back PainArmsPlatelet Rich Plasma injection to the lumbar facet joint
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Glucocorticoid facet joint injection for chronic back or neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Trends in lumbar radiofrequency ablation utilization from 2007 to 2016.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rajni VekariaWarwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Ree'thee BhattWarwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
David R EllardWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. d.r.ellard@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2992-048X
Nicholas HenschkeInstitute for Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin UnderwoodWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Harbinder SandhuWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, The University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
University of Warwick · GBHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

Department of Health 11/31/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvidence supporting the use of therapeutic intra-articular facet joint injections for patients with suspected facet joint pain is sparse. A systematic review including a narrative synthesis was carried out to determine if intra-articular facet joint injections with active drug are more effective in reducing back pain and back pain-related disability than a sham procedure or a placebo/inactive injection. Secondly, to determine if intra-articular facet joint injections with active drug or placebo/inactive injection are more effective in reducing back pain and back pain-related disability than conservative treatment.

methodsMedline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Index to Chiropractic Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through April 2015. Data were screened and single extraction with independent verification and risk of bias assessment was performed.

resultsA total of 391 records were screened, and six trials were included. The trials included were small (range 18-109 participants) and overall in terms of pain and disability outcomes most were inconclusive. Only two of the trials report any significant between-group differences in pain (mean difference -1.0, 95% CI -2.0 to -0.1) and (p = 0.032) or disability (mean difference -3.0, 95% CI -6.2 to 0.2) and (p = 0.013) outcomes.

conclusionsThe studies found here were clinically diverse and precluded any meta-analysis. A number of methodological issues were identified. The positive results, whilst interpreted with caution, do suggest that there is a need for further high-quality work in this area.

Indexed as

Zygapophyseal JointAdrenal Cortex HormonesHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularLow Back PainTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesDisabilityIntra-articular facet joint injectionsLow back painSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26906169
OpenAlexW2284887870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.