Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26905573›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2016

Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training.

E Z Barsom, M Graafland, M P Schijven

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 154 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05570799 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Using Gamification and Augmented Reality in Mechanical Ventilation Teaching on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDamanhour UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled410ConditionsGamification, Augmented RealityArmsAugmented Reality and Kahoot game learning
NCT05894005 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Immersive 360-degree Video in Improving Spatial Orientation Among Medical Students.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2025 to 2026Enrolled44ConditionsVirtual RealityArmsImmersive Virtual Reality (IVR), Traditional 2-D Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A mixed reality hand fracture simulator for virtual K-wire fixation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E Z BarsomDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M GraaflandDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M P SchijvenDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.p.schijven@amc.uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7013-0116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputer-based applications are increasingly used to support the training of medical professionals. Augmented reality applications (ARAs) render an interactive virtual layer on top of reality. The use of ARAs is of real interest to medical education because they blend digital elements with the physical learning environment. This will result in new educational opportunities. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate to which extent augmented reality applications are currently used to validly support medical professionals training.

methodsPubMed, Embase, INSPEC and PsychInfo were searched using predefined inclusion criteria for relevant articles up to August 2015. All study types were considered eligible. Articles concerning AR applications used to train or educate medical professionals were evaluated.

resultsTwenty-seven studies were found relevant, describing a total of seven augmented reality applications. Applications were assigned to three different categories. The first category is directed toward laparoscopic surgical training, the second category toward mixed reality training of neurosurgical procedures and the third category toward training echocardiography. Statistical pooling of data could not be performed due to heterogeneity of study designs. Face-, construct- and concurrent validity was proven for two applications directed at laparoscopic training, face- and construct validity for neurosurgical procedures and face-, content- and construct validity in echocardiography training. In the literature, none of the ARAs completed a full validation process for the purpose of use.

conclusionAugmented reality applications that support blended learning in medical training have gained public and scientific interest. In order to be of value, applications must be able to transfer information to the user. Although promising, the literature to date is lacking to support such evidence.

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationHumansLaparoscopyLearningNeurosurgical ProceduresSoftwareAugmented realityMedical educationMedical specialist trainingSurgeryTraining

Identifiers

PMID26905573
PMCPMC5009168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.