SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2016
Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 154 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Using Gamification and Augmented Reality in Mechanical Ventilation Teaching on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The Efficacy of Immersive 360-degree Video in Improving Spatial Orientation Among Medical Students.
Who cites it
154 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Augmented Reality in Surgical Training: Systematic Review of Its Impact on Technical Performance in Surgical Trainees.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Simulation training in spinal endoscopic surgery: a systematic review of current status.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Using Virtual Reality to Enhance Surgical Skills and Engagement in Orthopedic Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Virtual reality headsets for perimetry testing: a systematic review.Eye (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Virtual reality and augmented reality in medical education: an umbrella review.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Pooled it
- Extended Reality in Neurosurgical Education: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluation of simulation models in neurosurgical training according to face, content, and construct validity: a systematic review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Pooled it
- Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review.International journal of medical education · 2020Pooled it
- Glitches to growth: Lessons learned from developing and testing an augmented reality smartphone app for substance use treatment.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2026Trial
- Delivering remote procedural training on peripheral intravenous cannulation to medical students using the Microsoft Hololens 2: a mixed-methods evaluation.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Integrating augmented reality into health media campaigns: toward a more behavioral impact economic evaluation.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Comparing a virtual reality head-mounted display to on-screen three-dimensional visualization and two-dimensional computed tomography data for training in decision making in hepatic surgery: a randomized controlled study.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Trial
- Virtual reality as a teaching method for resuscitation training in undergraduate first year medical students during COVID-19 pandemic: a randomised controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2022Trial
- From promise to practice: digital health through the lens of neonatal care.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- From Prototype to Practice: Mixed Methods Study of Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality for Complex Oncology Surgical Workflows.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Utility of extended reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of training efficiency and glenoid guidewire accuracy.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- A mixed reality hand fracture simulator for virtual K-wire fixation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Collocated mixed reality for basic life support training in medical students: a randomised pilot feasibility trial.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- An Experimental Study on the Effectiveness and Usefulness of 360° Virtual Reality Simulation in Korean Medical Education: A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Contemporary Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Radiation Oncology: A Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputer-based applications are increasingly used to support the training of medical professionals. Augmented reality applications (ARAs) render an interactive virtual layer on top of reality. The use of ARAs is of real interest to medical education because they blend digital elements with the physical learning environment. This will result in new educational opportunities. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate to which extent augmented reality applications are currently used to validly support medical professionals training.
methodsPubMed, Embase, INSPEC and PsychInfo were searched using predefined inclusion criteria for relevant articles up to August 2015. All study types were considered eligible. Articles concerning AR applications used to train or educate medical professionals were evaluated.
resultsTwenty-seven studies were found relevant, describing a total of seven augmented reality applications. Applications were assigned to three different categories. The first category is directed toward laparoscopic surgical training, the second category toward mixed reality training of neurosurgical procedures and the third category toward training echocardiography. Statistical pooling of data could not be performed due to heterogeneity of study designs. Face-, construct- and concurrent validity was proven for two applications directed at laparoscopic training, face- and construct validity for neurosurgical procedures and face-, content- and construct validity in echocardiography training. In the literature, none of the ARAs completed a full validation process for the purpose of use.
conclusionAugmented reality applications that support blended learning in medical training have gained public and scientific interest. In order to be of value, applications must be able to transfer information to the user. Although promising, the literature to date is lacking to support such evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.