Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26905402›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2016

Colorectal cancer prevention: Perspectives of key players from social networks in a low-income rural US region.

Nancy E Schoenberg, Kathryn Eddens, Adam Jonas, Claire Snell-Rood, Christina R Studts, Benjamin Broder-Oldach, Mira L Katz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Multilevel Approach to Understand the Context and Potential Solutions for Low Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Rates in Rural Appalachia Clinics.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Social networks as predictors of colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nancy E SchoenbergDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; nesch@uky.edu.
Kathryn EddensDepartment of Health Behavior, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Adam JonasGatton School of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Claire Snell-RoodDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Christina R StudtsDepartment of Health Behavior, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Benjamin Broder-OldachCollege of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mira L KatzCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000117NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social networks influence health behavior and health status. Within social networks, "key players" often influence those around them, particularly in traditionally underserved areas like the Appalachian region in the USA. From a total sample of 787 Appalachian residents, we identified and interviewed 10 key players in complex networks, asking them what comprises a key player, their role in their network and community, and ideas to overcome and increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Key players emphasized their communication skills, resourcefulness, and special occupational and educational status in the community. Barriers to CRC screening included negative perceptions of the colonoscopy screening procedure, discomfort with the medical system, and misinformed perspectives on screening. Ideas to improve screening focused on increasing awareness of women's susceptibility to CRC, providing information on different screening tests, improving access, and the key role of health-care providers and key players themselves. We provide recommendations to leverage these vital community resources.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePovertySocial SupportAppalachian RegionColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicKentuckyMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOhioCancer screeningcolorectal cancerhealth inequitiesqualitativeruralsocial networks

Identifiers

PMID26905402
PMCPMC4764956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.