Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26905396›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

An evaluation of the feasibility and usability of a proof of concept mobile app for adverse event reporting post influenza vaccination.

Kumanan Wilson, Katherine M Atkinson, Jacqueline Westeinde, Cameron Bell, Kim Marty, Dean Fergusson, Shelley L Deeks, Natasha Crowcroft, Julie A Bettinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kumanan Wilsona Clinical Epidemiology Program; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute ; Ottawa , Canada.
Katherine M Atkinsona Clinical Epidemiology Program; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute ; Ottawa , Canada.
Jacqueline Westeindea Clinical Epidemiology Program; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute ; Ottawa , Canada.
Cameron Bella Clinical Epidemiology Program; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute ; Ottawa , Canada.
Kim Martye Vaccine Evaluation Center; Department of Pediatrics ; University of British Columbia ; Vancouver , Canada.
Dean Fergussona Clinical Epidemiology Program; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute ; Ottawa , Canada.
Shelley L Deeksg Public Health Ontario ; Toronto , Canada.
Natasha Crowcroftg Public Health Ontario ; Toronto , Canada.
Julie A Bettingerd Department of Public Health Sciences ; Karolinska Institutet ; Stockholm , Sweden.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute3M (United States) · USKarolinska Institutet · SEOttawa Hospital · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Canadian National Vaccine Safety network (CANVAS) gathers and analyzes safety data on individuals receiving the influenza vaccine during the early stages of annual influenza vaccination campaigns with data collected via participant surveys through the Internet. We sought to examine whether it was feasible to use a mobile application (app) to facilitate AEFI reporting for the CANVAS network. To explore this, we developed a novel smartphone app, recruited participants from a hospital influenza immunization clinic and by word of mouth and instructed them to download and utilize the app. The app reminded participants to complete the CANVAS AEFI surveillance surveys ("AEFI surveys") on day 8 and 30, a survey capturing app usability metrics at day 30 ("usability survey") and provided a mechanism to report AEFI events spontaneously throughout the whole study period. All survey results and spontaneous reports were recorded on a privacy compliant, cloud server. A software plug-in, Lookback, was used to record the on-screen experience of the app sessions. Of the 76 participants who consented to participate, 48(63%) successfully downloaded the app and created a profile. In total, 38 unique participants completed all of the required surveillance surveys; transmitting 1104 data points (survey question responses and spontaneous reports) from 83 completed surveys, including 21 usability surveys and one spontaneous report. In total, we received information on new or worsening health conditions after receiving the influenza vaccine from 11(28%) participants. Of the usability survey responses, 86% agreed or strongly agreed that they would prefer to use a mobile app based reporting system instead of a web-based system. The single spontaneous report received was from a participant who had also reported using the Day 8 survey. Of Lookback observable sessions, an accurate transmission proportion of 100% (n=290) was reported for data points. We demonstrated that a mobile app can be used for AEFI reporting, although download and survey completion proportions suggest potential barriers to adoption. Future studies should examine implementation of mobile reporting in a broader audience and impact on the quality of reporting of adverse events following immunization.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsMobile ApplicationsAdultCanadaDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccinesadverse eventdrug reaction reporting systemshealth technologyimmunizationmobile apps

Identifiers

PMID26905396
PMCPMC4964836
OpenAlexW2328223172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.