SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016
Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transarterial radioembolization versus transarterial chemoembolization for tumor control and survival outcomes in early to intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- NCCN Guidelines Insights: Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 1.2017.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2017Guideline
- Management of people with early- or very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: an attempted network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- External beam radiotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Hydrogel-based tumor embolization and synergistic therapeutic strategies.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Trans-arterial chemo-emobilization (TACE) combined with laparoscopic portal vein ligation and terminal branches portal vein embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a novel conversion strategy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Anti-programmed cell death ligand 1-based immunotherapy in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus and metastasis: Three case reports.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Identifying Prognostic Significance of RCL1 and Four-Gene Signature as Novel Potential Biomarkers in HCC Patients.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2020Article
- Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Fractionation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States.Cureus · 2020Article
- Embolotherapy for Hepatic Oncology: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.Digestive disease interventions · 2020Article
- Review
- Critical review of multidisciplinary non-surgical local interventional ablation techniques in primary or secondary liver malignancies.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2019Article
- Selective internal radiation therapy: an effective treatment for hormonal syndromes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Hepatic oncology · 2018Article
- Strategies for prediction and mitigation of radiation-induced liver toxicity.Journal of radiation research · 2018Article
- The Expanding Role of Systemic Therapy in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Review
- VESPRO: An Individual Patient Data Prospective Meta-Analysis of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Versus Sorafenib for Advanced, Locally Advanced, or Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma of the SARAH and SIRveNIB Trials.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
- Interventional Oncology in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Progress Through Innovation.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma is the most common liver neoplasm and the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Moreover, its incidence has increased dramatically since the mid-2000s. While surgical resection and liver transplantation are the main curative treatments, only around 20% of people with early hepatocellular carcinoma may benefit from these therapies. Current treatment options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma include various ablative and trans-arterial therapies in addition to the drug sorafenib.
objectivesTo determine the benefits and harms of yttrium-90 microsphere trans-arterial radioembolisation either as a monotherapy or in combination with other systemic or locoregional therapies versus placebo, no treatment, or other similar systemic or locoregional therapies for people with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. SEARCH
methodsWe reviewed data from the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded. We also checked reference lists of primary original studies and review articles manually for further related articles (cross-references) up to December 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies included all randomised clinical trials comparing yttrium-90-90 microsphere radioembolisation either as a monotherapy or in combination with other systemic or locoregional therapies versus placebo, no treatment, or other systemic or locoregional therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The two review authors independently extracted the relevant information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes for this review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the studies. The two review authors assessed risk of bias of the included trials using pre-defined risk of bias domains. We used Trial Sequential Analysis to control the risk of random errors. We assessed the methodological quality with GRADE. MAIN
resultsTwo randomised clinical trials with 68 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Both trials were at high risk of bias, and we rated the evidence as very low quality. One of the included trials compared radioembolisation versus chemoembolization for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma as classified by the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, while the other included trial was an interim analysis of a randomised trial assessing radioembolisation combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib monotherapy in participants with BCLC-advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma. The available data were insufficient to perform the planned analyses. Neither of the two trials reported data on all-cause mortality, cancer-related mortality, or time to progression of the tumour. The trial comparing radioembolisation with chemoembolization reported quality of life and serious adverse events, and there were no statistically significant differences between the trial groups with regard to these outcomes at week 12. On the basis of the two included randomised clinical trials, single-session radioembolisation appeared to be as safe as multiple sessions of chemoembolization for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma and had a similar impact on quality of life, but data were too sparse to exclude even major differences. Radioembolisation followed by sorafenib appeared to be as well tolerated as sorafenib alone for advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma, but data were too sparse to exclude even major differences. We also identified five ongoing studies evaluating the topic of our review. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere was insufficient evidence to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolisation for people with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Further randomised clinical trials are mandatory to better assess the potential beneficial and harmful outcomes of yttrium-90 microsphere trans-arterial radioembolisation either as a monotherapy or in combination with other systemic or locoregional therapies versus placebo, no treatment, or other systemic or locoregional therapies for people with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.