Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904977›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2016

What is a clinical pathway? Refinement of an operational definition to identify clinical pathway studies for a Cochrane systematic review.

Adegboyega K Lawal, Thomas Rotter, Leigh Kinsman, Andreas Machotta, Ulrich Ronellenfitsch, Shannon D Scott, Donna Goodridge, Christopher Plishka, Gary Groot

Registry-linked trialAbstract readLetterSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04490798 (A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study to Determine the Effectiveness of Integrated a Clinical Pathway Approach for Chronic Pain Treatment With Acupuncture in a Pain Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04490798 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort Study to Determine the Effectiveness of Integrated a Clinical Pathway Approach for Chronic Pain Treatment With Acupuncture in a Pain Clinic

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Son LlatzerRan2020 to 2021Enrolled3,245ConditionsChronic Pain, Lumbar Back Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee, HeadacheArmsElectroacupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Oral nutrition interventions in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer: A systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Urinary tract infections in children.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Seventh Åland Island Meeting on von Willebrand Disease.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adegboyega K LawalCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. lawal.kazeem@usask.ca.
Thomas RotterCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. Thomas.rotter@usask.ca.
Leigh KinsmanUniversity of Tasmania and Tasmanian Health Organisation (North), Launceston, Tasmania, Australia. leigh.kinsman@utas.edu.au.
Andreas MachottaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands. a.machotta@erasmusmc.nl.
Ulrich RonellenfitschUniversity Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Department of Surgery, Mannheim, Germany. ulrich.ronellenfitsch@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
Shannon D ScottFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. ss14@ualberta.ca.
Donna GoodridgeCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. donna.goodridge@usask.ca.
Christopher PlishkaCollege of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. chris.plishka@usask.ca.
Gary GrootCollege of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. garygroot@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical pathways (CPWs) are a common component in the quest to improve the quality of health. CPWs are used to reduce variation, improve quality of care, and maximize the outcomes for specific groups of patients. An ongoing challenge is the operationalization of a definition of CPW in healthcare. This may be attributable to both the differences in definition and a lack of conceptualization in the field of clinical pathways. This correspondence article describes a process of refinement of an operational definition for CPW research and proposes an operational definition for the future syntheses of CPWs literature. Following the approach proposed by Kinsman et al. (BMC Medicine 8(1):31, 2010) and Wieland et al. (Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 17(2):50, 2011), we used a four-stage process to generate a five criteria checklist for the definition of CPWs. We refined the operational definition, through consensus, merging two of the checklist's criteria, leading to a more inclusive criterion for accommodating CPW studies conducted in various healthcare settings. The following four criteria for CPW operational definition, derived from the refinement process described above, are (1) the intervention was a structured multidisciplinary plan of care; (2) the intervention was used to translate guidelines or evidence into local structures; (3) the intervention detailed the steps in a course of treatment or care in a plan, pathway, algorithm, guideline, protocol or other 'inventory of actions' (i.e. the intervention had time-frames or criteria-based progression); and (4) the intervention aimed to standardize care for a specific population. An intervention meeting all four criteria was considered to be a CPW. The development of operational definitions for complex interventions is a useful approach to appraise and synthesize evidence for policy development and quality improvement.

Indexed as

BiasCritical PathwaysDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based MedicineHumansResearch DesignTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26904977
PMCPMC4765053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.