Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904967›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Real-Time Control of a Neuroprosthetic Hand by Magnetoencephalographic Signals from Paralysed Patients.

Ryohei Fukuma, Takufumi Yanagisawa, Youichi Saitoh, Koichi Hosomi, Haruhiko Kishima, Takeshi Shimizu, Hisato Sugata, Hiroshi Yokoi, Masayuki Hirata, Yukiyasu Kamitani and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. MEG-BMI to Control Phantom Limb Pain.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2018
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Lower Limb Exoskeleton Sensors: State-of-the-Art.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. A Roadmap Towards Standards for Neurally Controlled End Effectors.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryohei FukumaOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Takufumi YanagisawaOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Youichi SaitohOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Koichi HosomiOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Haruhiko KishimaOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Takeshi ShimizuOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Hisato SugataOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Hiroshi YokoiThe University of Electro-Communications, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Systems, Chofu 182-8585, Japan.
Masayuki HirataOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Yukiyasu KamitaniATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Department of Neuroinformatics, Seika-cho 619-0288, Japan.
Toshiki YoshimineOsaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
Osaka University · JPKyoto University · JPUniversity of Electro-Communications · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroprosthetic arms might potentially restore motor functions for severely paralysed patients. Invasive measurements of cortical currents using electrocorticography have been widely used for neuroprosthetic control. Moreover, magnetoencephalography (MEG) exhibits characteristic brain signals similar to those of invasively measured signals. However, it remains unclear whether non-invasively measured signals convey enough motor information to control a neuroprosthetic hand, especially for severely paralysed patients whose sensorimotor cortex might be reorganized. We tested an MEG-based neuroprosthetic system to evaluate the accuracy of using cortical currents in the sensorimotor cortex of severely paralysed patients to control a prosthetic hand. The patients attempted to grasp with or open their paralysed hand while the slow components of MEG signals (slow movement fields; SMFs) were recorded. Even without actual movements, the SMFs of all patients indicated characteristic spatiotemporal patterns similar to actual movements, and the SMFs were successfully used to control a neuroprosthetic hand in a closed-loop condition. These results demonstrate that the slow components of MEG signals carry sufficient information to classify movement types. Successful control by paralysed patients suggests the feasibility of using an MEG-based neuroprosthetic hand to predict a patient's ability to control an invasive neuroprosthesis via the same signal sources as the non-invasive method.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsAdultBrain-Computer InterfacesHandHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexMovementParalysisSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID26904967
PMCPMC4764841
OpenAlexW2301660868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.