Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904778›Full record

ReviewJournal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives

A Review of Tools to Assist Hospitals in Meeting Community Health Assessment and Implementation Strategy Requirements.

Karen E Schifferdecker, Dorothy A Bazos, Kaleb A Sutherland, Lea R Ayers LaFave, Laural Ruggles, Rudolph Fedrizzi, Jaime Hoebeke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen E Schifferdecker
Dorothy A Bazos
Kaleb A Sutherland
Lea R Ayers LaFave
Laural Ruggles
Rudolph Fedrizzi
Jaime Hoebeke

Funding

REDUCING DISPARITIES IN HEALTH FOR VULNERABLE POPULATIONS IN NH & VT (CATEGORY 2)U48DP001935 · DP · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI FISHER, ELLIOTT S · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent changes in U.S. national policies and regulations have created an opportunity for meaningful collaborations to take place between health systems, public health departments, and social service organizations. For medical systems, and particularly tax-exempt hospitals, new requirements include community health assessments (CHAs) and implementation strategies to address identified health needs. Individuals and groups responsible for meeting the new CHA and implementation strategy requirements may be unsure about the best ways to achieve specific aspects of the CHA process. In this report, we provide an in-depth review and rating of tools developed by public health and community experts that cover the steps necessary to meet the new requirements. A team of three community and public health experts and the authors developed a rating sheet based on a well-known community health improvement process model and on the steps in the new requirements to identify and systematically rate nine comprehensive tools. The ratings and recommendations provide a guide for hospitals in choosing tools that will best assist them in meeting the new requirements.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsCooperative BehaviorHospitalsEconomics, HospitalHealth PolicyHumansTax ExemptionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26904778
PMCPMC4830260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.