Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904678›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2016

Diagnostic Methods of Helicobacter pylori Infection for Epidemiological Studies: Critical Importance of Indirect Test Validation.

Muhammad Miftahussurur, Yoshio Yamaoka

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03310255 (Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Renal Transplant Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03310255 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Renal Transplant Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled86ConditionsHelicobacter Pylori Infection, Renal Transplant InfectionArmsH pylori Faecal Antigen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. On the Role of Food in the Transmission ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Development of a colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for Helicobacter pylori detection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. ImprovingFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori cagA virulence factor and validation of serological tests in a population from Northeastern Brazil.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Assessment ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  19. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Diagnosis ofHealth science reports · 2024
    Article
  20. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad MiftahussururDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu 879-5593, Japan; Gastroentero-Hepatology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Airlangga University, Faculty of Medicine, Surabaya 60131, Indonesia; Institute of Tropical Disease, Airlangga University, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia.
Yoshio YamaokaDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu 879-5593, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine and Michael DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Airlangga University · IDOita University · JP

Funding

REGULATION OF CXC CHEMOKINE EXPRESSION BY H. PYLORIR01DK062813 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI YAMAOKA, YOSHIO · 2004 to 2013
$3.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK62813NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062813
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the methods developed to detect H. pylori infection, determining the gold standard remains debatable, especially for epidemiological studies. Due to the decreasing sensitivity of direct diagnostic tests (histopathology and/or immunohistochemistry [IHC], rapid urease test [RUT], and culture), several indirect tests, including antibody-based tests (serology and urine test), urea breath test (UBT), and stool antigen test (SAT) have been developed to diagnose H. pylori infection. Among the indirect tests, UBT and SAT became the best methods to determine active infection. While antibody-based tests, especially serology, are widely available and relatively sensitive, their specificity is low. Guidelines indicated that no single test can be considered as the gold standard for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection and that one should consider the method's advantages and disadvantages. Based on four epidemiological studies, culture and RUT present a sensitivity of 74.2-90.8% and 83.3-86.9% and a specificity of 97.7-98.8% and 95.1-97.2%, respectively, when using IHC as a gold standard. The sensitivity of serology is quite high, but that of the urine test was lower compared with that of the other methods. Thus, indirect test validation is important although some commercial kits propose universal cut-off values.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic StudiesAntigens, BacterialBreath TestsFecesHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansPredictive Value of TestsUreaUreaseAntigens, BacterialUreaUrease

Identifiers

PMID26904678
PMCPMC4745376
OpenAlexW2274036795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.