ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2016
The standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies 2015 update: is there a missing link to the triumvirate?
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reporting standards for cerebrospinal fluid studies: more transparency of laboratory data is needed.Infection · 2024Article
- Red blood cell distribution width: the importance of preanalytical and analytical phase variables.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Article
- Red Blood Cell Distribution Width as a Biomarker in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Technical Notes [Letter].Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023Article
- Complete Blood Cell Count-Derived Biomarkers and Clinical Studies: Is It Time for New Reporting Criteria? Comment on Anand et al. Utility of Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) as a Noninvasive Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 5222 Cases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- STARD guidelines: another piece of an intricate puzzle for evaluating the quality of scientific publishing.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- The impact of preanalytical variability in clinical trials: are we underestimating the issue?Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Improving the Preoperative Diagnostic Accuracy of Acute Appendicitis. Can Fecal Calprotectin Be Helpful?PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.