Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904518›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2016

Tissue-Specific Signatures in the Transcriptional Response to Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infection of Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes ricinus Tick Cell Lines.

Pilar Alberdi, Karen L Mansfield, Raúl Manzano-Román, Charlotte Cook, Nieves Ayllón, Margarita Villar, Nicholas Johnson, Anthony R Fooks, José de la Fuente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Coinfection ecology and pathogen emergence in aApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Coinfection Ecology and Pathogen Emergence in amedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards modelling tick-virus interactions using the weakly pathogenicFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Apoptosis and Autophagy: Current Understanding in Tick-Pathogen Interactions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Enlisting thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Interactions Between Ticks and Lyme Disease Spirochetes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Roadmap for Tick-Borne Flavivirus Research in the "Omics" Era.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Tick-Virus Interactions: Toll Sensing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Pilar AlberdiSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas- Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha Ciudad Real, Spain.
Karen L MansfieldAnimal and Plant Health Agency New Haw, Surrey, UK.
Raúl Manzano-RománParasitología Animal, Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca (IRNASA, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas) Salamanca, Spain.
Charlotte CookAnimal and Plant Health Agency New Haw, Surrey, UK.
Nieves AyllónSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas- Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha Ciudad Real, Spain.
Margarita VillarSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas- Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha Ciudad Real, Spain.
Nicholas JohnsonAnimal and Plant Health Agency New Haw, Surrey, UK.
Anthony R FooksAnimal and Plant Health AgencyNew Haw, Surrey, UK; Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of LiverpoolLiverpool, UK.
José de la FuenteSaBio, Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos IREC-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas- Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La ManchaCiudad Real, Spain; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State UniversityStillwater, OK, USA.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESInstituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca · ESUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research G1100148/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplasma phagocytophilum are transmitted by Ixodes spp. ticks and have become one of the most common and relevant tick-borne pathogens due to their impact on human and animal health. Recent results have increased our understanding of the molecular interactions between Ixodes scapularis and A. phagocytophilum through the demonstration of tissue-specific molecular pathways that ensure pathogen infection, development and transmission by ticks. However, little is known about the Ixodes ricinus genes and proteins involved in the response to A. phagocytophilum infection. The tick species I. scapularis and I. ricinus are evolutionarily closely related and therefore similar responses are expected in A. phagocytophilum-infected cells. However, differences may exist between I. scapularis ISE6 and I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 tick cells associated with tissue-specific signatures of these cell lines. To address this hypothesis, the transcriptional response to A. phagocytophilum infection was characterized by RNA sequencing and compared between I. scapularis ISE6 and I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 tick cell lines. The transcriptional response to infection of I. scapularis ISE6 cells resembled that of tick hemocytes while the response in I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 cells was more closely related to that reported previously in infected tick midguts. The inhibition of cell apoptosis by A. phagocytophilum appears to be a key adaptation mechanism to facilitate infection of both vertebrate and tick cells and was used to investigate further the tissue-specific response of tick cell lines to pathogen infection. The results supported a role for the intrinsic pathway in the inhibition of cell apoptosis by A. phagocytophilum infection of I. scapularis ISE6 cells. In contrast, the results in I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 cells were similar to those obtained in tick midguts and suggested a role for the JAK/STAT pathway in the inhibition of apoptosis in tick cells infected with A. phagocytophilum. Nevertheless, tick cell lines were derived from embryonated eggs and may contain various cell populations with different morphology and behavior that could affect transcriptional response to infection. These results suggested tissue-specific signatures in I. scapularis ISE6 and I. ricinus IRE/CTVM20 tick cell line response to A. phagocytophilum infection that support their use as models for the study of tick-pathogen interactions.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAnimalsApoptosisBase SequenceCell LineGene Expression RegulationHost-Pathogen InteractionsIxodesRNASequence Analysis, RNATranscription, GeneticRNAanaplasmaapoptosisrickettsiaticktick cell linetranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID26904518
PMCPMC4748044
OpenAlexW2294625546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.