Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904509›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2016

Vaccination of Elk (Cervus canadensis) with Brucella abortus Strain RB51 Overexpressing Superoxide Dismutase and Glycosyltransferase Genes Does Not Induce Adequate Protection against Experimental Brucella abortus Challenge.

Pauline Nol, Steven C Olsen, Jack C Rhyan, Nammalwar Sriranganathan, Matthew P McCollum, Steven G Hennager, Alana A Pavuk, Phillip J Sprino, Stephen M Boyle, Randall J Berrier and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Immune Responses and Efficacy ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pauline NolWildlife Livestock Disease Investigations Team, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, United States Department of Agriculture Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Steven C OlsenAgricultural Research Services, United States Department of Agriculture, National Animal Disease Center Ames, IA, USA.
Jack C RhyanWildlife Livestock Disease Investigations Team, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, United States Department of Agriculture Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Nammalwar SriranganathanCenter for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Virginia Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Matthew P McCollumWildlife Livestock Disease Investigations Team, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, United States Department of Agriculture Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Steven G HennagerNational Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, United States Department of Agriculture Ames, IA, USA.
Alana A PavukDepartment of Pathobiology and Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Phillip J SprinoColorado Serum Company Denver, CO, USA.
Stephen M BoyleCenter for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Virginia Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Randall J BerrierColorado Serum Company Denver, CO, USA.
Mo D SalmanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO, USA.
United States Department of Agriculture · USColorado State University · USVirginia Tech · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, elk (Cervus canadensis) have been implicated as the source of Brucella abortus infection for numerous cattle herds in the Greater Yellowstone Area. In the face of environmental and ecological changes on the landscape, the range of infected elk is expanding. Consequently, the development of effective disease management strategies for wild elk herds is of utmost importance, not only for the prevention of reintroduction of brucellosis to cattle, but also for the overall health of the Greater Yellowstone Area elk populations. In two studies, we evaluated the efficacy of B. abortus strain RB51 over-expressing superoxide dismutase and glycosyltransferase for protecting elk from infection and disease caused by B. abortus after experimental infection with a virulent B. abortus strain. Our data indicate that the recombinant vaccine does not protect elk against brucellosis. Further, work is needed for development of an effective brucellosis vaccine for use in elk.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBrucella abortusBrucella VaccineBrucellosisDeerFemaleGlycosyltransferasesSuperoxide DismutaseVaccinationAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialBrucella VaccineGlycosyltransferasesSuperoxide DismutaseBrucella abortuselkglycosyltransferaseO-side chainRB51superoxide dismutasewildlife vaccination

Identifiers

PMID26904509
PMCPMC4748031
OpenAlexW2276508006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.