Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904387›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2015

Prediction of Response to Temozolomide in Low-Grade Glioma Patients Based on Tumor Size Dynamics and Genetic Characteristics.

P Mazzocco, C Barthélémy, G Kaloshi, M Lavielle, D Ricard, A Idbaih, D Psimaras, M-A Renard, A Alentorn, J Honnorat and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modulation of Cell State to Improve Drug Therapy.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

P MazzoccoInria, project-team Numed, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon Lyon France.
C BarthélémyInria, project-team Popix, Université Paris-Sud Orsay France.
G KaloshiAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neurologie Mazarin; INSERM, U975, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Université Pierre & Marie Curie Paris VI, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, CNRS UMR 7225 and UMR-S975 Paris France.
M LavielleInria, project-team Popix, Université Paris-Sud Orsay France.
D RicardHôpital d'instruction des Armées du Val-de-Grâce Paris France.
A IdbaihAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neurologie Mazarin; INSERM, U975, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Université Pierre & Marie Curie Paris VI, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, CNRS UMR 7225 and UMR-S975 Paris France.
D PsimarasAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neurologie Mazarin; INSERM, U975, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Université Pierre & Marie Curie Paris VI, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, CNRS UMR 7225 and UMR-S975 Paris France.
M-A RenardAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neurologie Mazarin; INSERM, U975, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Université Pierre & Marie Curie Paris VI, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, CNRS UMR 7225 and UMR-S975 Paris France.
A AlentornAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neurologie Mazarin; INSERM, U975, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Université Pierre & Marie Curie Paris VI, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, CNRS UMR 7225 and UMR-S975 Paris France.
J HonnoratHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Neuro-oncologie; Université de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center INSERM U1028/CNRS UMR Lyon France.
J-Y DelattreAP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neurologie Mazarin; INSERM, U975, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Université Pierre & Marie Curie Paris VI, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, CNRS UMR 7225 and UMR-S975 Paris France.
F DucrayHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Neuro-oncologie; Université de Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center INSERM U1028/CNRS UMR Lyon France.
B RibbaInria, project-team Numed, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon Lyon France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both molecular profiling of tumors and longitudinal tumor size data modeling are relevant strategies to predict cancer patients' response to treatment. Herein we propose a model of tumor growth inhibition integrating a tumor's genetic characteristics (p53 mutation and 1p/19q codeletion) that successfully describes the time course of tumor size in patients with low-grade gliomas treated with first-line temozolomide chemotherapy. The model captures potential tumor progression under chemotherapy by accounting for the emergence of tissue resistance to treatment following prolonged exposure to temozolomide. Using information on individual tumors' genetic characteristics, in addition to early tumor size measurements, the model was able to predict the duration and magnitude of response, especially in those patients in whom repeated assessment of tumor response was obtained during the first 3 months of treatment. Combining longitudinal tumor size quantitative modeling with a tumor''s genetic characterization appears as a promising strategy to personalize treatments in patients with low-grade gliomas.

Identifiers

PMID26904387
PMCPMC4759703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.