Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904301›Full record

ReviewNeural plasticity2016

Caught in the Net: Perineuronal Nets and Addiction.

Megan Slaker, Jordan M Blacktop, Barbara A Sorg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural plasticity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan SlakerDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA.
Jordan M BlacktopDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA.
Barbara A SorgDepartment of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA.

Funding

Perineuronal nets and cocaine-associated memoriesR01DA040965 · NIDA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, TRAVIS EUGENE, SORG, BARBARA A · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Extracellular Matrix, Cocaine, and MemoryR01DA033404 · NIDA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SORG, BARBARA A · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033404NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to drugs of abuse induces plasticity in the brain and creates persistent drug-related memories. These changes in plasticity and persistent drug memories are believed to produce aberrant motivation and reinforcement contributing to addiction. Most studies have explored the effect drugs of abuse have on pre- and postsynaptic cells and astrocytes; however, more recently, attention has shifted to explore the effect these drugs have on the extracellular matrix (ECM). Within the ECM are unique structures arranged in a net-like manner, surrounding a subset of neurons called perineuronal nets (PNNs). This review focuses on drug-induced changes in PNNs, the molecules that regulate PNNs, and the expression of PNNs within brain circuitry mediating motivation, reward, and reinforcement as it pertains to addiction.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAnimalsBrainExtracellular MatrixHumansMemoryMotivationNeuronsRewardSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID26904301
PMCPMC4745418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.