Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904207›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2016

Bronchodilator response in adults with bronchiectasis: correlation with clinical parameters and prognostic implications.

Wei-Jie Guan, Yong-Hua Gao, Gang Xu, Hui-Min Li, Jing-Jing Yuan, Jin-Ping Zheng, Rong-Chang Chen, Nan-Shan Zhong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01761214 (Bacteriology and Sputum and Systemic Inflammation in Steady-state, Acute Exacerbation and Recovery of Bronchiectasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01761214 naunknown statusnot on this map

Bacteriology and Sputum and Systemic Inflammation in Steady-state, Acute Exacerbation and Recovery of Bronchiectasis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuangzhou Institute of Respiratory DiseaseRan2012 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsBronchiectasisArmsFluroquinolones, Beta-lactamase inhibitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Global impact of bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei-Jie Guan1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China ; 3 Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Yong-Hua Gao1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China ; 3 Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Gang Xu1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China ; 3 Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Hui-Min Li1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China ; 3 Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Jing-Jing Yuan1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China ; 3 Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Jin-Ping Zheng1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China ; 3 Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Rong-Chang Chen1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China ; 3 Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Nan-Shan Zhong1 State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China ; 3 Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Therapeutic Strategy for LAM (Lymphangioleiomyomatosis)UH3TR000961 · NCATS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI EISSA, N. TONY · 2014 to 2016
$3.0M
Therapeutic Strategy for LAM (Lymphangioleiomyomatosis)UH2TR000961 · NCATS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI EISSA, N. TONY · 2013 to 2013
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR000961NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBronchial dilation testing is an important tool to assess airway reversibility in adults with bronchiectasis. This study aims to investigate the association of bronchodilator response (BDR) and clinical parameters in bronchiectasis, and the utility of BDR to indicate lung function decline and risks of bronchiectasis exacerbations (BEs).

methodsWe recruited 129 patients with clinically stable bronchiectasis. Baseline measurements included assessment of sputum inflammation and matrix metalloproteinase-8 and -9, sputum bacterial culture, spirometry, bronchial dilation test (for baseline FEV1 less than 80% predicted only) and chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Bronchiectasis patients were followed-up for 1 year to determine the incidence of BEs and lung function trajectories. Significant BDR was defined as FEV1 improvement from pre-dose value by at least 200 mL and 12%. Clinical trial registry No.: NCT01761214; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

resultsBDR was negatively correlated with baseline FEV1 percentage predicted, but not blood or sputum eosinophil count. Significant BDR was not associated with greater proportion of never-smokers, poorer past history, greater HRCT scores, poorer diffusing capacity or increased sputum matrix metalloproteinases (all P>0.05). There was a trend towards higher bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) and greater proportion of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolation or infection. Significant BDR at baseline was linked to poorer spirometry, but not more rapid lung function decline, throughout follow-up. Patients with significant BDR demonstrated non-significantly lower risks of experiencing the first BEs than those without (P=0.09 for log-rank test).

conclusionsSignificant BDR is associated with poorer lung function compared with non-significant BDR. Whether BDR predicts future risks of BEs needs to be tested in a larger cohort.

Indexed as

Bronchiectasisbronchiectasis exacerbation (BE)bronchodilator response (BDR)clinical parameter

Identifiers

PMID26904207
PMCPMC4740118
OpenAlexW2280192919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.