Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904186›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Metabarcoding of fungal communities associated with bark beetles.

Kirsten E Miller, Kevin Hopkins, Daegan J G Inward, Alfried P Vogler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pomegranate Woody Mycobiota Associated with Wood Decay.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Fungal systematics and evolution · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Illumina sequencing and assessment of new cost-efficient protocol for metagenomic-DNA extraction from environmental water samples.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirsten E MillerDepartment of Life Sciences Natural History Museum Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD UK; Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London Silwood Park Campus Ascot SL5 7PY UK.
Kevin HopkinsDepartment of Life Sciences Natural History Museum Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD UK.
Daegan J G InwardCentre for Ecosystems, Society and Biosecurity Forest Research Alice Holt Lodge Farnham Surrey GU10 4LH UK.
Alfried P VoglerDepartment of Life Sciences Natural History Museum Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD UK; Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London Silwood Park Campus Ascot SL5 7PY UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many species of fungi are closely allied with bark beetles, including many tree pathogens, but their species richness and patterns of distribution remain largely unknown. We established a protocol for metabarcoding of fungal communities directly from total genomic DNA extracted from individual beetles, showing that the ITS3/4 primer pair selectively amplifies the fungal ITS. Using three specimens of bark beetle from different species, we assess the fungal diversity associated with these specimens and the repeatability of these estimates in PCRs conducted with different primer tags. The combined replicates produced 727 fungal Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) for the specimen of Hylastes ater, 435 OTUs for Tomicus piniperda, and 294 OTUs for Trypodendron lineatum, while individual PCR reactions produced on average only 229, 54, and 31 OTUs for the three specimens, respectively. Yet, communities from PCR replicates were very similar in pairwise comparisons, in particular when considering species abundance, but differed greatly among the three beetle specimens. Different primer tags or the inclusion of amplicons in separate libraries did not impact the species composition. The ITS2 sequences were identified with the Lowest Common Ancestor approach and correspond to diverse lineages of fungi, including Ophiostomaceae and Leotiomycetes widely found to be tree pathogens. We conclude that Illumina MiSeq metabarcoding reliably captures fungal diversity associated with bark beetles, although numerous PCR replicates are recommended for an exhaustive sample. Direct PCR from beetle DNA extractions provides a rapid method for future surveys of fungal species diversity and their associations with bark beetles and environmental variables.

Indexed as

IlluminaITS2Ophiostomaceaeprimer tagsScolytinaetree pathogens

Identifiers

PMID26904186
PMCPMC4752364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.