Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26904010›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Diversity, Abundance, and Niche Differentiation of Ammonia-Oxidizing Prokaryotes in Mud Deposits of the Eastern China Marginal Seas.

Shaolan Yu, Peng Yao, Jiwen Liu, Bin Zhao, Guiling Zhang, Meixun Zhao, Zhigang Yu, Xiao-Hua Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Fine-Scale Structuring of PlanktonicApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Monthly distribution of ammonia-oxidizing microbes in a tropical bay.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Spatial Heterogeneity ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shaolan YuLaboratory of Marine Microbiology, College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China Qingdao, China.
Peng YaoKey Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of ChinaQingdao, China; Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of ChinaQingdao, China; Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdao, China.
Jiwen LiuLaboratory of Marine Microbiology, College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China Qingdao, China.
Bin ZhaoKey Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China Qingdao, China.
Guiling ZhangKey Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China Qingdao, China.
Meixun ZhaoKey Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of ChinaQingdao, China; Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of ChinaQingdao, China; Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdao, China.
Zhigang YuKey Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China Qingdao, China.
Xiao-Hua ZhangLaboratory of Marine Microbiology, College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eastern China marginal seas (ECMS) are prominent examples of river-dominated ocean margins, whose most characteristic feature is the existence of isolated mud patches on sandy sediments. Ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes play a crucial role in the nitrogen cycles of many marine environments, including marginal seas. However, few studies have attempted to address the distribution patterns of ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in mud deposits of these seas. The horizontal and vertical community composition and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) and bacteria (AOB) were investigated in mud deposits of the South Yellow Sea (SYS) and the East China Sea (ECS) by using amoA clone libraries and quantitative PCR. The diversity of AOB was comparable or higher in the mud zone of SYS and lower in ECS when compared with AOA. Vertically, surface sediments had generally higher diversity of AOA and AOB than middle and bottom layers. Diversity of AOA and AOB showed significant correlation with latitude. Nitrosopumilus and Nitrosospira lineages dominated AOA and AOB communities, respectively. Both AOA and AOB assemblages exhibited greater variations across different sites than those among various depths at one site. The abundance of bacterial amoA was generally higher than that of archaeal amoA, and both of them decreased with depth. Niche differentiation, which was affected by dissolved oxygen, salinity, ammonia, and silicate (SiO[Formula: see text]), was observed between AOA and AOB and among different groups of them. The spatial distribution of AOA and AOB was significantly correlated with δ(15)NTN and SiO[Formula: see text], and nitrate and δ(13)C, respectively. Both archaeal and bacterial amoA abundance correlated strongly with SiO[Formula: see text]. This study improves our understanding of spatial distribution of AOA and AOB in ecosystems featuring oceanic mud deposits.

Indexed as

AOAAOBcommunity structureseastern China marginal seasmud depositsspatial distribution

Identifiers

PMID26904010
PMCPMC4751261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.