ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2016
The Representation of Objects in Apraxia: From Action Execution to Error Awareness.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gerstmann's Syndrome and Limb Apraxia: A Single Case Study.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Article
- A preliminary study of white matter disconnections underlying deficits in praxis in left hemisphere stroke patients.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Voxel-Based Lesion Analysis of Ideomotor Apraxia.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- fNIRS-Based Differences in Cortical Activation during Tool Use, Pantomimed Actions, and Meaningless Actions between Children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Different Neural Activities for Actions and Language within the Shared Brain Regions: Evidence from Action and Verb Generation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Is There a Causal Link between the Left Lateralization of Language and Other Brain Asymmetries? A Review of Data Gathered in Patients with Focal Brain Lesions.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Assessing Anosognosia in Apraxia of Common Tool-Use With the VATA-NAT.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2018Article
- Limb apraxia and the left parietal lobe.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018Review
- A Cognitive Overview of Limb Apraxia.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016Review
- Brain Dynamics of Action Monitoring in Higher-Order Motor Control Disorders: The Case of Apraxia.eNeuroArticle
- Performance of the Pentagon Drawing test for the screening of older adults with Alzheimer's dementia.Dementia & neuropsychologiaArticle
- The influence of age, gender and education on the performance of healthy individuals on a battery for assessing limb apraxia.Dementia & neuropsychologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apraxia is a well-known syndrome characterized by the sufferer's inability to perform routine gestures. In an attempt to understand the syndrome better, various different theories have been developed and a number of classifications of different subtypes have been proposed. In this article review, we will address these theories with a specific focus on how the use of objects helps us to better understand upper limb apraxia. With this aim, we will consider transitive vs. intransitive action dissociation as well as less frequent types of apraxia involving objects, i.e., constructive apraxia and magnetic apraxia. Pantomime and the imitation of objects in use are also considered with a view to dissociating the various different components involved in upper limb apraxia. Finally, we discuss the evidence relating to action recognition and awareness of errors in the execution of actions. Various different components concerning the use of objects emerge from our analysis and the results show that knowledge of an object and sensory-motor representations are supported by other functions such as spatial and body representations, executive functions and monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.