Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26903820›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2016

Perisaccadic Updating of Visual Representations and Attentional States: Linking Behavior and Neurophysiology.

Alexandria C Marino, James A Mazer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diverse and dynamic influences of saccades on visual representations in the mouse superior colliculus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The influence of a moving object's location on object identity judgments.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2025
    Article
  8. The Representation of Stimulus Features during Stable Fixation and Active Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Decoding Remapped Spatial Information in the Peri-Saccadic Period.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynamic saccade context triggers more stable object-location binding.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Visual Remapping.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandria C MarinoInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale UniversityNew Haven, CT, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, Yale University School of MedicineNew Haven, CT, USA.
James A MazerInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale UniversityNew Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of MedicineNew Haven, CT, USA; Department of Psychology, Yale UniversityNew Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007205 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZMIERCZAK, BARBARA I · 1985 to 2019
$42.9M
CRCNS: Model-driven single-neuron studies of cortical remappingR01EY025103 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MAZER, JAMES A · 2014 to 2016
$634k
Neural mechanism of sustained spatial attention across saccadesF30MH102010 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MARINO, ALEXANDRIA CONCETTA · 2013 to 2014
$86k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025103NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007205NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH102010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During natural vision, saccadic eye movements lead to frequent retinal image changes that result in different neuronal subpopulations representing the same visual feature across fixations. Despite these potentially disruptive changes to the neural representation, our visual percept is remarkably stable. Visual receptive field remapping, characterized as an anticipatory shift in the position of a neuron's spatial receptive field immediately before saccades, has been proposed as one possible neural substrate for visual stability. Many of the specific properties of remapping, e.g., the exact direction of remapping relative to the saccade vector and the precise mechanisms by which remapping could instantiate stability, remain a matter of debate. Recent studies have also shown that visual attention, like perception itself, can be sustained across saccades, suggesting that the attentional control system can also compensate for eye movements. Classical remapping could have an attentional component, or there could be a distinct attentional analog of visual remapping. At this time we do not yet fully understand how the stability of attentional representations relates to perisaccadic receptive field shifts. In this review, we develop a vocabulary for discussing perisaccadic shifts in receptive field location and perisaccadic shifts of attentional focus, review and synthesize behavioral and neurophysiological studies of perisaccadic perception and perisaccadic attention, and identify open questions that remain to be experimentally addressed.

Indexed as

neurophysiologyreceptive field remappingreceptive fieldssaccadesvisual attentionvisual perceptionvisual psychophysics

Identifiers

PMID26903820
PMCPMC4743436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.