Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26903796›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Restoring Behavior via Inverse Neurocontroller in a Lesioned Cortical Spiking Model Driving a Virtual Arm.

Salvador Dura-Bernal, Kan Li, Samuel A Neymotin, Joseph T Francis, Jose C Principe, William W Lytton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Large-Scale Mechanistic Models of Brain Circuits with Biophysically and Morphologically Detailed Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Tutorial: using NEURON for neuromechanical simulations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Salvador Dura-BernalDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Kan LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Samuel A NeymotinDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Joseph T FrancisDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate Medical CenterBrooklyn, NY, USA; BME Cullen College of Engineering, University of HoustonHouston, TX, USA.
Jose C PrincipeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
William W LyttonDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate Medical CenterBrooklyn, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, State University of New York Downstate Medical CenterBrooklyn, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, Kings County Hospital CenterBrooklyn, NY, USA.

Funding

Microconnectomics of neocortex: a multiscale computer modelU01EB017695 · NIBIB · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYTTON, WILLIAM W · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB017695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stimulation can be used as a tool to elicit natural sensations or behaviors by modulating neural activity. This can be potentially used to mitigate the damage of brain lesions or neural disorders. However, in order to obtain the optimal stimulation sequences, it is necessary to develop neural control methods, for example by constructing an inverse model of the target system. For real brains, this can be very challenging, and often unfeasible, as it requires repeatedly stimulating the neural system to obtain enough probing data, and depends on an unwarranted assumption of stationarity. By contrast, detailed brain simulations may provide an alternative testbed for understanding the interactions between ongoing neural activity and external stimulation. Unlike real brains, the artificial system can be probed extensively and precisely, and detailed output information is readily available. Here we employed a spiking network model of sensorimotor cortex trained to drive a realistic virtual musculoskeletal arm to reach a target. The network was then perturbed, in order to simulate a lesion, by either silencing neurons or removing synaptic connections. All lesions led to significant behvaioral impairments during the reaching task. The remaining cells were then systematically probed with a set of single and multiple-cell stimulations, and results were used to build an inverse model of the neural system. The inverse model was constructed using a kernel adaptive filtering method, and was used to predict the neural stimulation pattern required to recover the pre-lesion neural activity. Applying the derived neurostimulation to the lesioned network improved the reaching behavior performance. This work proposes a novel neurocontrol method, and provides theoretical groundwork on the use biomimetic brain models to develop and evaluate neurocontrollers that restore the function of damaged brain regions and the corresponding motor behaviors.

Indexed as

biomimeticinverse modelkernel adaptive filteringmusculoskeletal armneuroprostheticsneurostimulationspiking network modelvirtual arm

Identifiers

PMID26903796
PMCPMC4746359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.