Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26903783›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in health information managemen2016

Predicting 30- to 120-Day Readmission Risk among Medicare Fee-for-Service Patients Using Nonmedical Workers and Mobile Technology.

Andrey Ostrovsky, Lori O'Connor, Olivia Marshall, Amanda Angelo, Kelsy Barrett, Emily Majeski, Maxwell Handrus, Jeffrey Levy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in health information managemen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrey OstrovskyCare at Hand in San Francisco, CA.
Lori O'ConnorElder Services of Merrimack Valley in Lawrence, MA.
Olivia MarshallUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell School of Nursing in Lowell, MA.
Amanda AngeloUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell School of Nursing in Lowell, MA.
Kelsy BarrettUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell School of Nursing in Lowell, MA.
Emily MajeskiUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell School of Nursing in Lowell, MA.
Maxwell HandrusNestle Corporation in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jeffrey LevyCare at Hand in San Francisco, CA.
University of Massachusetts Lowell · USSan Francisco VA Health Care System · USElder Services of the Merrimack Valley · USNeste Oil (Finland) · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHospital readmissions are a large source of wasteful healthcare spending, and current care transition models are too expensive to be sustainable. One way to circumvent cost-prohibitive care transition programs is complement nurse-staffed care transition programs with those staffed by less expensive nonmedical workers. A major barrier to utilizing nonmedical workers is determining the appropriate time to escalate care to a clinician with a wider scope of practice. The objective of this study is to show how mobile technology can use the observations of nonmedical workers to stratify patients on the basis of their hospital readmission risk. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn area agency on aging in Massachusetts implemented a quality improvement project with the aim of reducing 30-day hospital readmission rates using a modified care transition intervention supported by mobile predictive analytics technology. Proprietary readmission risk prediction algorithms were used to predict 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120-day readmission risk.

resultsThe risk score derived from the nonmedical workers' observations had a significant association with 30-day readmission rate with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.12 (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1 .09-1.15) compared to an OR of 1.25 (95 percent CI, 1.19-1.32) for the risk score using nurse observations. Risk scores using nurse interpretation of nonmedical workers' observations show that patients in the high-risk category had significantly higher readmission rates than patients in the baseline-risk and mild-risk categories at 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after discharge. Of the 1,064 elevated-risk alerts that were triaged, 1,049 (98.6 percent) involved the nurse care manager, 804 (75.6 percent) involved the patient, 768 (72.2 percent) involved the health coach, 461 (43.3 percent) involved skilled nursing, and 235 (22.1 percent) involved the outpatient physician in the coordination of care in response to the alert. DISCUSSION: The predictive nature of the 30-day readmission risk scores is influenced by both nurse and nonmedical worker input, and both are required to adequately triage the needs of the patient.

conclusionAlthough this preliminary study is limited by a modest effect size, it demonstrates one approach to using technology to contribute to delivery model innovation that could curb wasteful healthcare spending by tapping into an existing underutilized workforce.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneInternetMedicarePatient ReadmissionAlgorithmsFee-for-Service PlansFemaleHumansMaleMassachusettsPredictive Value of TestsQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited Statescare transitionsdigital healthhospital readmissionslong-term supports and servicespost-acute carerisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID26903783
PMCPMC4739444
OpenAlexW2295971638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.