Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26903629›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Sterol and genomic analyses validate the sponge biomarker hypothesis.

David A Gold, Jonathan Grabenstatter, Alex de Mendoza, Ana Riesgo, Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo, Roger E Summons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chemical characterization of CProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecosystem relocation on Snowball Earth: Polar-alpine ancestry of the extant surface biosphere?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Developmental biology ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Bioprinting in Microgravity.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023
    Review
  12. De novo phytosterol synthesis in animals.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A GoldDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Jonathan GrabenstatterDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139;
Alex de MendozaInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientÍficas-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), 08003 Barcelona, Spain;
Ana RiesgoDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum of London, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;
Iñaki Ruiz-TrilloInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientÍficas-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Institut Català de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain.
Roger E SummonsDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; rsummons@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7144-8537

Funding

Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, Harold Pimentel · 2002 to 2026
$8.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular fossils (or biomarkers) are key to unraveling the deep history of eukaryotes, especially in the absence of traditional fossils. In this regard, the sterane 24-isopropylcholestane has been proposed as a molecular fossil for sponges, and could represent the oldest evidence for animal life. The sterane is found in rocks ∼650-540 million y old, and its sterol precursor (24-isopropylcholesterol, or 24-ipc) is synthesized today by certain sea sponges. However, 24-ipc is also produced in trace amounts by distantly related pelagophyte algae, whereas only a few close relatives of sponges have been assayed for sterols. In this study, we analyzed the sterol and gene repertoires of four taxa (Salpingoeca rosetta, Capsaspora owczarzaki, Sphaeroforma arctica, and Creolimax fragrantissima), which collectively represent the major living animal outgroups. We discovered that all four taxa lack C30 sterols, including 24-ipc. By building phylogenetic trees for key enzymes in 24-ipc biosynthesis, we identified a candidate gene (carbon-24/28 sterol methyltransferase, or SMT) responsible for 24-ipc production. Our results suggest that pelagophytes and sponges independently evolved C30 sterol biosynthesis through clade-specific SMT duplications. Using a molecular clock approach, we demonstrate that the relevant sponge SMT duplication event overlapped with the appearance of 24-isopropylcholestanes in the Neoproterozoic, but that the algal SMT duplication event occurred later in the Phanerozoic. Subsequently, pelagophyte algae and their relatives are an unlikely alternative to sponges as a source of Neoproterozoic 24-isopropylcholestanes, consistent with growing evidence that sponges evolved long before the Cambrian explosion ∼542 million y ago.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersDehydrocholesterolsEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenomicsMethyltransferasesModels, MolecularMolecular StructurePhylogenyPoriferaProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiarySpecies SpecificitySterolsTime Factors24-isopropenyl-22-dehydrocholesterolBiomarkersDehydrocholesterolsMethyltransferasesSterolsAmorpheaPoriferaspongessteranessterols

Identifiers

PMID26903629
PMCPMC4790988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.