Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26903596›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2017

Impact on smoking of England's 2012 partial tobacco point of sale display ban: a repeated cross-sectional national study.

Mirte A G Kuipers, Emma Beard, Sara C Hitchman, Jamie Brown, Karien Stronks, Anton E Kunst, Ann McNeill, Robert West

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Trends in Attempts to Quit Smoking in England Since 2007: A Time Series Analysis of a Range of Population-Level Influences.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mirte A G KuipersDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emma BeardDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Sara C HitchmanDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jamie BrownDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Karien StronksDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anton E KunstDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann McNeillDepartment of Addictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Robert WestDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NLAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14135Cancer Research UK 19501Cancer Research UK 22962Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA partial tobacco point of sale (PoS) display ban was introduced in large shops (>280 m

methodsData were used from 129 957 respondents participating in monthly, cross-sectional household surveys of representative samples of the English adult population aged 18+ years from January 2009 to February 2015. Interrupted-time series regression models assessed step changes in the level of current smoking and cigarette consumption in smokers and changes in the trends postban compared with preban. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic variables and e-cigarette use, seasonality and autocorrelation. Potential confounding by cigarette price was accounted for by time, as price was almost perfectly correlated with time.

resultsFollowing the display ban, there was no immediate step level change in smoking (-3.69% change, 95% CI -7.94 to 0.75, p=0.102) or in cigarette consumption (β -0.183, 95% CI -0.602 to 0.236). There was a significantly steeper decline in smoking post display ban (-0.46% change, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.20, p=0.001). This effect was demonstrated by respondents in manual occupations (-0.62% change, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.20, p=0.001), but not for those in non-manual occupations (-0.42, 95% CI -0.90 to 0.06, p=0.084). Cigarette consumption declined preban period (β -0.486, 95% CI -0.633 to -0.339, p<0.001), but no significant change in cigarette consumption trend was observed (β 0.019, 95% CI -0.006 to 0.042, p=0.131).

conclusionsThe partial tobacco PoS display ban introduced in England in April 2012 did not lead to an immediate decline in smoking, but was followed by a decline in the trend of smoking prevalence that could not be accounted for by seasonal factors, e-cigarette use or price changes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCommerceCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsEnglandFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMarketingMiddle AgedOccupationsSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvertising and PromotionPublic policySocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID26903596
PMCPMC6166602
OpenAlexW2304979390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.