ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016
Vestibular schwannoma and pituitary adenoma in the same patient: coincidence or novel clinical association?
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vestibular schwannoma coexisting with dermoid cyst: A case report.Oncology letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the years the authors have evaluated a number of patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) who have also been diagnosed with a pituitary adenoma (PA). No associations between these tumors have been established to date. The objective of the current study is to investigate the epidemiological association between VS and PA via a population-based study and to supplement these data with a retrospective case series of 12 patients who were evaluated at the authors' center over the past 15 years. An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database including all patients identified with a diagnosis of VS and/or PA was performed. A comparison between the observed and expected annual incidence was calculated and population differences between those with VS + PA were compared with single tumor populations. 9888 patients with VS and 26,577 patients with PA were identified among 822.9 million person-years. Within these populations, 31 patients were diagnosed with both tumor types. Overall, 1 in every 319 patients with VS was also diagnosed with a PA. The average annual incidence for VS was 1.2 per 100,000 persons per year while the average PA rate was 3.2 per 100,000 persons per year. The observed rate of co-incident VS and PA was greater than what is expected by chance alone assuming independence. The cohort of patients with coexisting VS and PA were older and more commonly male compared to VS-only or PA-only groups. These data strongly suggest that a common environmental or genetic predisposition exists for VS and PA development. Further study of this population may help elucidate the cause of tumorigenesis in a subset of patients with seemingly sporadic tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.