Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26902766›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Differential In Vitro and In Vivo Toxicities of Antimicrobial Peptide Prodrugs for Potential Use in Cystic Fibrosis.

Éanna Forde, André Schütte, Emer Reeves, Catherine Greene, Hilary Humphreys, Marcus Mall, Deirdre Fitzgerald-Hughes, Marc Devocelle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PEGylated Oligothioetheramide Prodrugs Activated by Host Serum Proteases.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Synergies with and Resistance to Membrane-Active Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in chemistry · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Éanna FordeCentre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland Department of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland fordee@tcd.ie.
André SchütteDepartment of Translational Pulmonology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Emer ReevesPulmonary Research Division, Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Catherine GreenePulmonary Research Division, Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Hilary HumphreysDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland Department of Microbiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Marcus MallDepartment of Translational Pulmonology, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Deirdre Fitzgerald-HughesDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Marc DevocelleCentre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Beaumont Hospital · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been considerable interest in the use of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as antimicrobial agents for the treatment of many conditions, including cystic fibrosis (CF). The challenging conditions of the CF patient lung require robust AMPs that are active in an environment of high proteolytic activity but that also have low cytotoxicity and immunogenicity. Previously, we developed prodrugs of AMPs that limited the cytotoxic effects of AMP treatment by rendering the antimicrobial activity dependent on the host enzyme neutrophil elastase (NE). However, cytotoxicity remained an issue. Here, we describe the further optimization of the AMP prodrug (pro-AMP) model for CF to produce pro-WMR, a peptide with greatly reduced cytotoxicity (50% inhibitory concentration against CFBE41o- cells, >300 μM) compared to that of the previous group of pro-AMPs. The bactericidal activity of pro-WMR was increased in NE-rich bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from CF patients (range, 8.4% ± 6.9% alone to 91.5% ± 5.8% with BAL fluid; P = 0.0004), an activity differential greater than that of previous pro-AMPs. In a murine model of lung delivery, the pro-AMP modification reduced host toxicity, with pro-WMR being less toxic than the active peptide. Previously, host toxicity issues have hampered the clinical application of AMPs. However, the development of application-specific AMPs with modifications that minimize toxicity similar to those described here can significantly advance their potential use in patients. The combination of this prodrug strategy with a highly active AMP has the potential to produce new therapeutics for the challenging conditions of the CF patient lung.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCell LineCystic FibrosisHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNeutrophilsProdrugsPseudomonas aeruginosaSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesProdrugs

Identifiers

PMID26902766
PMCPMC4862519
OpenAlexW2286298942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.