Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2016
Surgical margin-negative endoscopic mucosal resection with simple three-clipping technique: a randomized prospective study (with video).
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Of Endpoints and Equipoise: Reforming Clinical Trials in Colorectal Polyp Resection.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough endoscopic mucosal resection is an established colorectal polyp treatment, local recurrence occurs in 13 % of cases due to inadequate snaring. We evaluated whether pre-clipping to the muscularis propria resulted in resected specimens with negative surgical margins without thermal denaturation.
methodsOf 245 polyps from 114 patients with colorectal polyps under 20 mm, we included 188 polyps from 81 patients. We randomly allocated polyps to the conventional injection group (CG) (97 polyps) or the pre-clipping injection group (PG) (91 polyps). The PG received three-point pre-clipping to ensure ample gripping to the muscle layer on the oral and both sides of the tumor with 4 mL local injection. Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed to measure the resulting bulge. Outcomes included the number of instances of thermal denaturation of the horizontal/vertical margin (HMX/VMX) or positive horizontal/vertical margins (HM+/VM+), the shortest distance from tumor margins to resected edges, and the maximum bulge distances from tumor surface to the muscularis propria.
resultsThe numbers of HMX and HM+ in the CG and PG were 27 and 6, and 9 and 2 (P = 0.001), and VMX and VM+ were 8 and 5, and 0 and 0 (P = 0.057). The shortest distance from tumor margin to resected edge [median (range), mm] in polyps in the CG and PG was 0.6 (0-2.7) and 4.7 (2.1-8.9) (P = 0.018). The maximum bulge distances were 4.6 (3.0-8.0) and 11.0 (6.8-17.0) (P = 0.005).
conclusionsPre-clipping enabled surgical margin-negative resection without thermal denaturation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.