Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26902345›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Bioconversion of methane to lactate by an obligate methanotrophic bacterium.

Calvin A Henard, Holly Smith, Nancy Dowe, Marina G Kalyuzhnaya, Philip T Pienkos, Michael T Guarnieri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Imbalanced metabolism induced NHInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. A synthetic co-culture for bioproduction of ammonia from methane and air.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cre/Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Optimized Tools and Methods for Methanotroph Genome Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Calvin A HenardNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Holly SmithNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Nancy DoweNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Marina G KalyuzhnayaDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182 USA.
Philip T PienkosNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Michael T GuarnieriNational Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory · USSan Diego State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methane is the second most abundant greenhouse gas (GHG), with nearly 60% of emissions derived from anthropogenic sources. Microbial conversion of methane to fuels and value-added chemicals offers a means to reduce GHG emissions, while also valorizing this otherwise squandered high-volume, high-energy gas. However, to date, advances in methane biocatalysis have been constrained by the low-productivity and limited genetic tractability of natural methane-consuming microbes. Here, leveraging recent identification of a novel, tractable methanotrophic bacterium, Methylomicrobium buryatense, we demonstrate microbial biocatalysis of methane to lactate, an industrial platform chemical. Heterologous overexpression of a Lactobacillus helveticus L-lactate dehydrogenase in M. buryatense resulted in an initial titer of 0.06 g lactate/L from methane. Cultivation in a 5 L continuously stirred tank bioreactor enabled production of 0.8 g lactate/L, representing a 13-fold improvement compared to the initial titer. The yields (0.05 g lactate/g methane) and productivity (0.008 g lactate/L/h) indicate the need and opportunity for future strain improvement. Additionally, real-time analysis of methane utilization implicated gas-to-liquid transfer and/or microbial methane consumption as process limitations. This work opens the door to develop an array of methanotrophic bacterial strain-engineering strategies currently employed for biocatalytic sugar upgrading to "green" chemicals and fuels.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBiocatalysisBioreactorsFermentationGene ExpressionKineticsLactic AcidLactobacillus helveticusL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMetabolic EngineeringMethaneMethylococcaceaePlasmidsTransformation, BacterialTransgenesBacterial ProteinsLactic AcidL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMethane

Identifiers

PMID26902345
PMCPMC4763203
OpenAlexW2322469604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.