Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26902337›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2016

Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management.

Tobias Maurer, Matthias Eiber, Markus Schwaiger, Jürgen E Gschwend

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 286 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
286citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
55.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04509557 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

[177Lu]Ludotadipep Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Phase I Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFutureChemRan2020 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsMetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate CancerArms[177Lu]Ludotadipep
NCT05004285 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Multi Center, Non-randomized, Open, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Clinical Usefulness of [F-18]Florastamin PET/CT Imaging Diagnosis Compared to MRI Diagnosis in Prostate Cancer Risk Groups

TypeinterventionalSponsorFutureChemRan2021 to 2025Enrolled398ConditionsHigh Risk Prostate CarcinomaArms[F-18]Florastamin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

286 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 622 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Diagnostic efficacy of [BMC cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Incremental Impact of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Theranostics · 2020
    Trial
  13. Diagnostic accuracy ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Preclinical evaluation and first-in-human study ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

226 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias MaurerDepartment of Urology, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81671 Munich, Germany.
Matthias EiberDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81671 Munich, Germany.
Markus SchwaigerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81671 Munich, Germany.
Jürgen E GschwendDepartment of Urology, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81671 Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEMünchen Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, the findings of imaging procedures used for detection or staging of prostate cancer depend on morphology of lymph nodes or bone metabolism and do not always meet diagnostic needs. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane protein that has considerable overexpression on most prostate cancer cells, has gained increasing interest as a target molecule for imaging. To date, several small compounds for labelling PSMA have been developed and are currently being investigated as imaging probes for PET with the (68)Ga-labelled PSMA inhibitor Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys(Ahx)-HBED-CC being the most widely studied agent. (68)Ga-PSMA-PET imaging in combination with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) might provide additional molecular information on cancer localization within the prostate. In patients with primary prostate cancer of intermediate-risk to high-risk, PSMA-based imaging has been reported to improve detection of metastatic disease compared with CT or mpMRI, rendering additional cross-sectional imaging or bone scintigraphy unnecessary. Furthermore, in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer, use of (68)Ga-PSMA-PET imaging has been shown to increase detection of metastatic sites, even at low serum PSA values, compared with conventional imaging or PET examination with different tracers. Thus, although current knowledge is still limited and derived mostly from retrospective series, PSMA-based imaging holds great promise to improve prostate cancer management.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAnimalsAntigens, SurfaceBiomarkers, TumorGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAntigens, SurfaceBiomarkers, TumorFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase II

Identifiers

PMID26902337
OpenAlexW2287868019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.