Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26902300›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2016

Diagnosis of vertebral fractures in children: is a simplified algorithm-based qualitative technique reliable?

E Adiotomre, L Summers, A Allison, S J Walters, M Digby, P Broadley, I Lang, A C Offiah

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

E AdiotomreRadiology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust UK, Sheffield, UK.
L SummersSheffield Medical School, University of Sheffield UK, Sheffield, UK.
A AllisonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield UK, Sheffield, UK.
S J WaltersSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield UK, Sheffield, UK.
M DigbySheffield Medical School, University of Sheffield UK, Sheffield, UK.
P BroadleyRadiology Department, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TH, UK.
I LangRadiology Department, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TH, UK.
A C OffiahRadiology Department, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TH, UK. amaka.offiah@nhs.net.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0110-21240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of osteoporotic vertebral fractures allows treatment opportunity reducing future risk. There is no agreed standardised method for diagnosing paediatric vertebral fractures.

objectiveTo evaluate the precision of a modified adult algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) technique, applicable to children with primary or secondary osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsThree radiologists independently assessed lateral spine radiographs of 50 children with suspected reduction in bone mineral density using a modified ABQ scoring system and following simplification to include only clinically relevant parameters, a simplified ABQ score. A final consensus of all observers using simplified ABQ was performed as a reference standard for fracture characterisation. Kappa was calculated for interobserver agreement of the components of both scoring systems and intraobserver agreement of simplified ABQ based on a second read of 29 randomly selected images.

resultsInterobserver Kappa for modified ABQ scoring for fracture detection, severity and shape ranged from 0.34 to 0.49 Kappa for abnormal endplate and position assessment was 0.27 to 0.38. Inter- and intraobserver Kappa for simplified ABQ scoring for fracture detection and grade ranged from 0.37 to 0.46 and 0.45 to 0.56, respectively. Inter- and intraobserver Kappa for affected endplate ranged from 0.31 to 0.41 and 0.45 to 0.51, respectively. Subjectively, observers' felt simplified ABQ was easier and less time-consuming.

conclusionObserver reliability of modified and simplified ABQ was similar, with slight to moderate agreement for fracture detection and grade/severity. Due to subjective preference for simplified ABQ, we suggest its use as a semi-objective measure of diagnosing paediatric vertebral fractures.

Indexed as

Reproducibility of ResultsAlgorithmsBone DensityHumansObserver VariationSpinal FracturesSpineChildrenDiagnostic scoring systemObserver agreementOsteoporosisRadiographySpineVertebral fractureVertebral morphometry

Identifiers

PMID26902300
PMCPMC4841845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.