Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26902134›Full record

Observational studyHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2016

Evaluation of an enhanced recovery protocol after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients.

S Partelli, S Crippa, R Castagnani, G Ruffo, C Marmorale, A M Franconi, C De Angelis, M Falconi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Post-surgical diets in the ERAS protocol: D-ERAS scoping review.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Identifying Hospital Cost Savings Opportunities by Optimizing Surgical Approach for Distal Pancreatectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  14. Improved Outcomes in 394 Pancreatic Cancer Resections: the Impact of Enhanced Recovery Pathway.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S PartelliDepartement of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
S CrippaDepartement of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
R CastagnaniDepartement of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
G RuffoDepartment of Surgery, Ospedale "Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria", Negrar, Italy.
C MarmoraleDepartement of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
A M FranconiDepartement of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
C De AngelisDepartement of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
M FalconiDepartement of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. Electronic address: falconi.massimo@hsr.it.
Marche Polytechnic University · ITOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent evidence has shown that enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols decrease hospital stay following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and to evaluate the effect of introducing ERAS principles after PD in elderly patients.

methodsPatients ≥75 years were defined as elderly. Comparison of postoperative outcome was performed between 22 elderly patients who underwent ERAS (elderly ERAS + patients) and a historical cohort of 66 elderly patients who underwent standard protocols (elderly ERAS-patients).

resultsThe lowest adherence with ERAS among elderly patients was observed for starting a solid food diet within POD 4 (n = 7) and early drains removal (n = 2). The highest adherence was observed for post-operative glycemic control (n = 21), epidural analgesia (n = 21), mobilization (n = 20) and naso-gastric removal in POD 0 (n = 20). Post-operative outcomes did not differ between elderly ERAS+ and elderly ERAS- patients. In patients with an uneventful postoperative course, the median intention to discharge was earlier in elderly ERAS + patients as compared to the elderly ERAS- patients (4 days versus 8 days, P < 0.001).

conclusionAn ERAS protocol following PD seems to be feasible and safe among elderly although it is not associated with improved postoperative outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHistorically Controlled StudyHumansLength of StayMalePancreaticoduodenectomyPatient DischargePostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsPractice Guidelines as TopicRecovery of FunctionRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26902134
PMCPMC4814589
OpenAlexW2279856660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.