Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26902100›Full record

ArticleAngiogenesis2016

In situ validation of VEGFR-2 and α v ß 3 integrin as targets for breast lesion characterization.

Josef Ehling, Matthias Misiewicz, Saskia von Stillfried, Diana Möckel, Jessica Bzyl, Sibylle Pochon, Wiltrud Lederle, Ruth Knuechel, Twan Lammers, Moritz Palmowski and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angiogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Josef Ehling *Department of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Matthias Misiewicz *Department of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Saskia von StillfriedInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Diana MöckelDepartment of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Jessica BzylDepartment of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Sibylle PochonBracco Suisse SA, Geneva, Switzerland.
Wiltrud LederleDepartment of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Ruth KnuechelInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Twan LammersDepartment of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Moritz PalmowskiDepartment of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Fabian KiesslingDepartment of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEBracco (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

European Research Council 309495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) and α v ß 3 integrin are the most frequently addressed targets in molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis. In preclinical studies, molecular imaging of angiogenesis has shown potential to detect and differentiate benign and malignant lesions of the breast. Thus, in this retrospective clinical study employing patient tissues, the diagnostic value of VEGFR-2, α v ß 3 integrin and vascular area fraction for the diagnosis and differentiation of breast neoplasia was evaluated. To this end, tissue sections of breast cancer (n = 40), pre-invasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; n = 8), fibroadenoma (n = 40), radial scar (n = 6) and normal breast tissue (n = 40) were used to quantify (1) endothelial VEGFR-2, (2) endothelial α v ß 3 integrin and (3) total α v ß 3 integrin expression, as well as (4) the vascular area fraction. Sensitivity and specificity to differentiate benign from malignant lesions were calculated for each marker by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses. Whereas vessel density, as commonly used, did not significantly differ between benign and malignant lesions (AUROC: 0.54), VEGFR-2 and α v ß 3 integrin levels were gradually up-regulated in carcinoma versus fibroadenoma versus healthy tissue. The highest diagnostic accuracy for differentiating carcinoma from fibroadenoma was found for total α v ß 3 integrin expression (AUROC: 0.76), followed by VEGFR-2 (AUROC: 0.71) and endothelial α v ß 3 integrin expression (AUROC: 0.68). In conclusion, total α v ß 3 integrin expression is the best discriminator between breast cancer, fibroadenoma and normal breast tissue. With respect to vascular targeting and molecular imaging of angiogenesis, endothelial VEGFR-2 appeared to be slightly superior to endothelial α v ß 3 for differentiating benign from cancerous lesions.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEndothelial CellsFemaleHumansIntegrin alphaVbeta3Middle AgedReproducibility of ResultsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2Integrin alphaVbeta3Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2BR55Breast cancer screeningMammographyMolecular imagingRGD

Identifiers

PMID26902100
PMCPMC5432025
OpenAlexW2283304693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.