ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2016
Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM Analysis.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Laparoscopic vs. Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Learning Curve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Center Studies.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.BMC gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- Pancreaticojejunostomy without pancreatic duct stent after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: preliminary outcomes from a prospective randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- Learning curve of laparoscopic duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection: a single-center dual CUSUM and risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Coagulation disorders and thromboprophylaxis in pancreatic cancer: a review of current evidence and clinical challenges.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.Cancers · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic versus robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma after learning curves of surgeons: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Introducing Senhance robotic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty: initial experiences, learning curve, and mid-term outcomes from a single center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumors: a multicenter propensity score-matched comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Comparison of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma and impact factors on textbook outcome.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Magnamosis for rectal reconstruction in canines.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of short‑ and long‑term outcomes between laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy in overweight patients: a propensity score‑matched study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Reduced-port robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with optimized surgical field deployment: early results of single-site plus-two ports method.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Risk factors of textbook outcome in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: results from a prospective high-volume center study.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy based on a single surgeon's experience: a retrospective observational study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2024Article
- One hundred consecutive pancreatic resections using a novel pancreatico-jejunostomy technique.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Short‑ and long‑term outcomes after laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for elderly patients: a propensity score‑matched study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the learning curve and complications in unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cumulative sum analysis and risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), an advanced minimally invasive technique, has demonstrated advantages to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). However, this complex procedure requires a relatively long training period to ensure technical proficiency. This study was therefore designed to analyze the learning curve for LPD.
methodsFrom October 2010 to September 2015, 63 standard pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures were to be performed laparoscopically by a single surgeon at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 57 patients were included in the study. Data for all the patients, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, were prospectively collected and analyzed. The learning curve for LPD was evaluated using both cumulative sum (CUSUM) and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) methods. All of the variables among the learning curve phases were compared.
resultsBased on the CUSUM and the RA-CUSUM analyses, the learning curve for LPD was grouped into three phases: phase I was the initial learning period (cases 1-11), phase II represented the technical competence period (cases 12-38), and phase III was regarded as the challenging period (cases 39-57). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative ICU demand significantly decreased with the learning curve. More lymph nodes were collected after the initial learning period. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative complications or the 30-day mortality among the three phases. More challenging cases were encountered in phase III.
conclusionsAccording to this study, the learning curve for LPD consisted of three phases. Conservatively, to attain technical competence for performing LPD, a minimum of 40 cases are required for laparoscopic surgeons with a degree of laparoscopic experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26902090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.