Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26901771›Full record

ReviewThe Analyst2016

Paper-based analytical devices for environmental analysis.

Nathan A Meredith, Casey Quinn, David M Cate, Thomas H Reilly, John Volckens, Charles S Henry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Innovations in paper-based analytical devices and portable absorption photometers for onsite analysis.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan A MeredithDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. Chuck.Henry@ColoState.EDU.
Casey QuinnDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. John.Volckens@ColoState.EDU.
David M CateDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA and Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue, Washington 98007, USA.
Thomas H ReillyDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. Chuck.Henry@ColoState.EDU and Access Sensor Technologies, LLC, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, USA.
John VolckensDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. John.Volckens@ColoState.EDU and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.
Charles S HenryDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. Chuck.Henry@ColoState.EDU and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA and Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.

Funding

A New Paradigm for Workplace Air Sampling and Cost-Effective Exposure AssessmentR01OH010662 · OH · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY, CHARLES S, VOLCKENS, JOHN · 2015 to 2018
$2.0M
NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of paper-based microfluidics has experienced rapid growth over the past decade. Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs), originally developed for point-of-care medical diagnostics in resource-limited settings, are now being applied in new areas, such as environmental analyses. Low-cost paper sensors show great promise for on-site environmental analysis; the theme of ongoing research complements existing instrumental techniques by providing high spatial and temporal resolution for environmental monitoring. This review highlights recent applications of μPADs for environmental analysis along with technical advances that may enable μPADs to be more widely implemented in field testing.

Indexed as

EnvironmentPaperAnimalsChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalHumans

Identifiers

PMID26901771
PMCPMC9423764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.