ArticleNature methods2016
Inferring causal molecular networks: empirical assessment through a community-based effort.
Article in Nature methods, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed.
- A framework to map cAMP signalling nanodomains: phosphodiesterase-centred phosphoproteome-interactome networks (pPINs) in cardiac myocytes.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2026Review
- Benchmarking EGF signaling pathway inference using phosphoproteomics and kinase-substrate interactions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Roadmap for the Future of Systems Biology in Cancer Research.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Computational Approaches for Pathway-Centric Analysis of Protein Post-Translational Modifications.Proteomics · 2025Review
- Coupling causality and interpretable machine learning to reveal the reaction coordinate of C-N coupling with a supramolecular Cu-calix[8]arene catalyst.Digital discovery · 2025Article
- Quantifying interventional causality by knockoff operation.Science advances · 2025Article
- Vistla: identifying influence paths with information theory.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Directed Cyclic Graphs for Simultaneous Discovery of Time-Lagged and Instantaneous Causality from Longitudinal Data Using Instrumental Variables.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2025Article
- Informeasure: an R/bioconductor package for quantifying nonlinear dependence between variables in biological networks from an information theory perspective.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- NJGCG: A node-based joint Gaussian copula graphical model for gene networks inference across multiple states.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Gene regulatory networks in disease and ageing.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2024Review
- Molecular causality in the advent of foundation models.Molecular systems biology · 2024Review
- A single-cell multimodal view on gene regulatory network inference from transcriptomics and chromatin accessibility data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Estimation of multiple networks with common structures in heterogeneous subgroups.Journal of multivariate analysis · 2024Article
- Optimal linear ensemble of binary classifiers.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Article
- EnsInfer: a simple ensemble approach to network inference outperforms any single method.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Phosphoproteomics data-driven signalling network inference: Does it work?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Network-based approaches for modeling disease regulation and progression.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Review
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It remains unclear whether causal, rather than merely correlational, relationships in molecular networks can be inferred in complex biological settings. Here we describe the HPN-DREAM network inference challenge, which focused on learning causal influences in signaling networks. We used phosphoprotein data from cancer cell lines as well as in silico data from a nonlinear dynamical model. Using the phosphoprotein data, we scored more than 2,000 networks submitted by challenge participants. The networks spanned 32 biological contexts and were scored in terms of causal validity with respect to unseen interventional data. A number of approaches were effective, and incorporating known biology was generally advantageous. Additional sub-challenges considered time-course prediction and visualization. Our results suggest that learning causal relationships may be feasible in complex settings such as disease states. Furthermore, our scoring approach provides a practical way to empirically assess inferred molecular networks in a causal sense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.