Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26901353›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Dynamic Drusen Remodelling in Participants of the Nutritional AMD Treatment-2 (NAT-2) Randomized Trial.

Giuseppe Querques, Bénédicte M J Merle, Nicole M Pumariega, Pascale Benlian, Cécile Delcourt, Alain Zourdani, Heather B Leisy, Michele D Lee, R Theodore Smith, Eric H Souied

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Long-term Evolution and Remodeling of Soft Drusen in Rhesus Macaques.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe QuerquesDepartment of Ophthalmology - Hôpital intercommunal de Créteil - Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Bénédicte M J MerleDepartment of Ophthalmology - Hôpital intercommunal de Créteil - Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Nicole M PumariegaDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Pascale BenlianAPHP - Hôpital Saint Antoine - biochemistry and molecular biology department - F-75012 Paris; Université Lille 2, INSERM UMRS 1011, Lille, France.
Cécile DelcourtINSERM, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, Bordeaux, France.
Alain ZourdaniDepartment of Ophthalmology - Hôpital intercommunal de Créteil - Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
Heather B LeisyDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Michele D LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
R Theodore SmithDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Eric H SouiedDepartment of Ophthalmology - Hôpital intercommunal de Créteil - Université Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
New York University · USUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRHôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FRHôpital Saint-Antoine · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the dynamic remodeling of drusen in subjects with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) receiving a three-year course of oral docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or placebo.

settingInstitutional setting.

methodsThree hundred subjects with age-related maculopathy and neovascular AMD in the fellow eye were randomly assigned to receive either 840 mg/day DHA or placebo for 3 years. Main outcome measures of this post-hoc sub-group analysis were progression of drusen number, total diameter, and total area on fundus photography, and their association with DHA supplementation, socio-demographic and genetic characteristics.

resultsDrusen progression was analyzed in 167 subjects that did not develop CNV (87 that received DHA and 80 that received placebo). None of the drusen remodeling outcomes were significantly associated with DHA supplementation. Total drusen diameter reduction in the inner subfield was significantly associated with age (older patients: r = -0.17; p = 0.003). Women showed a tendency to decreased total drusen diameter in the inner subfield with CFH polymorphism (p = 0.03), where women with TT genotype tended to have a greater reduction in drusen diameter than other genotypes (CC and CT). Drusen area in the inner subfield was more reduced in older patients (r = -0.17) and in women (p = 0.01). Drusen number showed no significant trends.

conclusionsDynamic drusen remodeling with net reduction in drusen load over three years was found in patients with exudative AMD in one eye and drusen in the other eye (study-eye). This reduction was correlated with increased age and female gender, and showed a tendency to be influenced by CFH genotype, but did not appear to be affected by DHA supplementation.

trial registrationControlled-Trials.com ISRCTN98246501.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAged, 80 and overDocosahexaenoic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedOptic Disk DrusenProspective StudiesDocosahexaenoic Acids

Identifiers

PMID26901353
PMCPMC4762680
OpenAlexW2281470897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.