Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26901310›Full record

ArticleNanotechnology2016

Label-free capture of breast cancer cells spiked in buffy coats using carbon nanotube antibody micro-arrays.

Farhad Khosravi, Patrick Trainor, Shesh N Rai, Goetz Kloecker, Eric Wickstrom, Balaji Panchapakesan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Farhad KhosraviDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Small Systems Laboratory, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01532, USA.
Patrick TrainorDepartment of Biostatistics, Biostatistics Shared Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Shesh N RaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Biostatistics Shared Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Goetz KloeckerHematology and Oncology, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Eric WickstromDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19130, USA.
Balaji PanchapakesanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Small Systems Laboratory, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01532, USA.

Funding

Nanotube Antibody Arrays for Profiling Circulating Diseased CellsR15CA156322 · NCI · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI PANCHAPAKESAN, BALAJI · 2011 to 2011
$463k
NCI NIH HHS 7 R15CA156322-02NCI NIH HHS R15 CA156322NCI NIH HHS R15CA156322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We demonstrate the rapid and label-free capture of breast cancer cells spiked in buffy coats using nanotube-antibody micro-arrays. Single wall carbon nanotube arrays were manufactured using photo-lithography, metal deposition, and etching techniques. Anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) antibodies were functionalized to the surface of the nanotube devices using 1-pyrene-butanoic acid succinimidyl ester functionalization method. Following functionalization, plain buffy coat and MCF7 cell spiked buffy coats were adsorbed on to the nanotube device and electrical signatures were recorded for differences in interaction between samples. A statistical classifier for the 'liquid biopsy' was developed to create a predictive model based on dynamic time warping to classify device electrical signals that corresponded to plain (control) or spiked buffy coats (case). In training test, the device electrical signals originating from buffy versus spiked buffy samples were classified with ∼100% sensitivity, ∼91% specificity and ∼96% accuracy. In the blinded test, the signals were classified with ∼91% sensitivity, ∼82% specificity and ∼86% accuracy. A heatmap was generated to visually capture the relationship between electrical signatures and the sample condition. Confocal microscopic analysis of devices that were classified as spiked buffy coats based on their electrical signatures confirmed the presence of cancer cells, their attachment to the device and overexpression of EpCAM receptors. The cell numbers were counted to be ∼1-17 cells per 5 μl per device suggesting single cell sensitivity in spiked buffy coats that is scalable to higher volumes using the micro-arrays.

Indexed as

AntibodiesBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SeparationFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsNanotubes, CarbonProtein Array AnalysisStaining and LabelingAntibodiesNanotubes, Carbon

Identifiers

PMID26901310
PMCPMC5065025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.