Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26901161›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Vital Sign Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Women with Hypovolemic Shock: The Role of Shock Index.

Alison M El Ayadi, Hannah L Nathan, Paul T Seed, Elizabeth A Butrick, Natasha L Hezelgrave, Andrew H Shennan, Suellen Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
29.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. FIGO recommendations on the management of postpartum hemorrhage 2022.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Prognosticating Fetomaternal ICU Outcomes.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison M El AyadiBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco; San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Hannah L NathanWomen's Health Academic Centre, King's College London,London, United Kingdom.
Paul T SeedWomen's Health Academic Centre, King's College London,London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth A ButrickBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco; San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Natasha L HezelgraveWomen's Health Academic Centre, King's College London,London, United Kingdom.
Andrew H ShennanWomen's Health Academic Centre, King's College London,London, United Kingdom.
Suellen MillerBixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco; San Francisco, California, United States of America.
King's College London · GBReproductive Science Center · US

Funding

Non-pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment for Obstetrical HemorrhageR01HD053129 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MILLER, SUELLEN · 2007 to 2011
$2.4M
Department of Health DRF-2013-06-171Medical Research Council MR/N006240/1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053129NICHD NIH HHS R01HD053129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the optimal vital sign predictor of adverse maternal outcomes in women with hypovolemic shock secondary to obstetric hemorrhage and to develop thresholds for referral/intensive monitoring and need for urgent intervention to inform a vital sign alert device for low-resource settings. STUDY

designWe conducted secondary analyses of a dataset of pregnant/postpartum women with hypovolemic shock in low-resource settings (n = 958). Using receiver-operating curve analysis, we evaluated the predictive ability of pulse, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, shock index, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure for three adverse maternal outcomes: (1) death, (2) severe maternal outcome (death or severe end organ dysfunction morbidity); and (3) a combined severe maternal and critical interventions outcome comprising death, severe end organ dysfunction morbidity, intensive care admission, blood transfusion ≥ 5 units, or emergency hysterectomy. Two threshold parameters with optimal rule-in and rule-out characteristics were selected based on sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values.

resultsShock index was consistently among the top two predictors across adverse maternal outcomes. Its discriminatory ability was significantly better than pulse and pulse pressure for maternal death (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively), diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure for severe maternal outcome (p<0.01), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure for severe maternal outcome and critical interventions (p<0.01). A shock index threshold of ≥ 0.9 maintained high sensitivity (100.0) with clinical practicality, ≥ 1.4 balanced specificity (range 70.0-74.8) with negative predictive value (range 93.2-99.2), and ≥ 1.7 further improved specificity (range 80.7-90.8) without compromising negative predictive value (range 88.8-98.5).

conclusionsFor women with hypovolemic shock from obstetric hemorrhage, shock index was consistently a strong predictor of all adverse outcomes. In lower-level facilities in low resource settings, we recommend a shock index threshold of ≥ 0.9 indicating need for referral, ≥ 1.4 indicating urgent need for intervention in tertiary facilities and ≥ 1.7 indicating high chance of adverse outcome. The vital sign alert device incorporated values 0.9 and 1.7; however, all thresholds will be prospectively validated and clinical pathways for action appropriate to setting established prior to clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Vital SignsAdultArea Under CurveFemaleHumansHypovolemiaMaternal MortalityPatient Outcome AssessmentPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsROC CurveShockYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26901161
PMCPMC4762936
OpenAlexW2287797923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.