Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26901068›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2016

The genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut.

David John Bertioli, Steven B Cannon, Lutz Froenicke, Guodong Huang, Andrew D Farmer, Ethalinda K S Cannon, Xin Liu, Dongying Gao, Josh Clevenger, Sudhansu Dash and 29 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 466 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
466citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
208.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

466 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,039 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Identification of theBiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

406 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 16 institutions in 6 countries.

David John BertioliInstitute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0294-7284
Steven B CannonCorn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-8034
Lutz FroenickeGenome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Guodong HuangBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Andrew D FarmerNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Ethalinda K S CannonDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Xin LiuBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Dongying GaoCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Josh ClevengerInstitute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA.
Sudhansu DashNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Longhui RenInterdepartmental Genetics Graduate Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Márcio C MoretzsohnEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Brazil.
Kenta ShirasawaKazusa DNA Research Institute, Department of Frontier Research, Kisarazu, Japan.
Wei HuangDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Bruna VidigalInstitute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Brian AbernathyCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Ye ChuDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA.
Chad E NiederhuthDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Pooja UmaleNational Center for Genome Resources, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Ana Cláudia G AraújoEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Brazil.
Alexander KozikGenome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Kyung Do KimCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Mark D BurowTexas A&M AgriLife Research, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Xingjun WangShandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology Research Center, Jinan, China.
Xinyou ZhangHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
Noelle BarkleyPlant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Griffin, Georgia, USA.
Patrícia M GuimarãesEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, Brazil.
Sachiko IsobeKazusa DNA Research Institute, Department of Frontier Research, Kisarazu, Japan.
Baozhu GuoCrop Protection and Management Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Tifton, Georgia, USA.
Boshou LiaoChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Oil Crops Research Institute, Wuhan, China.
H Thomas StalkerDepartment of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Robert J SchmitzDepartment of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Brian E SchefflerMiddle Southern Area Genomics Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, Mississippi, USA.
Soraya C M Leal-BertioliCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Xu XunBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Scott A JacksonCenter for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Richard MichelmoreGenome Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Peggy Ozias-AkinsInstitute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA.
University of Georgia · USAgricultural Research Service · USBGI Group (China) · CNBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRIowa State University · USNational Center for Genome Resources · USUniversity of California, Davis · USKazusa DNA Research Institute · JPUniversidade de Brasília · BRChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHenan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INNatural Resources Conservation Service · USNorth Carolina State University · USShandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNTexas Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea) is an allotetraploid with closely related subgenomes of a total size of ∼2.7 Gb. This makes the assembly of chromosomal pseudomolecules very challenging. As a foundation to understanding the genome of cultivated peanut, we report the genome sequences of its diploid ancestors (Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis). We show that these genomes are similar to cultivated peanut's A and B subgenomes and use them to identify candidate disease resistance genes, to guide tetraploid transcript assemblies and to detect genetic exchange between cultivated peanut's subgenomes. On the basis of remarkably high DNA identity of the A. ipaensis genome and the B subgenome of cultivated peanut and biogeographic evidence, we conclude that A. ipaensis may be a direct descendant of the same population that contributed the B subgenome to cultivated peanut.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantArachisChromosomes, PlantDNA MethylationDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGenetic LinkageMolecular Sequence AnnotationPloidiesSequence Analysis, DNASyntenyDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID26901068
OpenAlexW2273760207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.