Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26901065›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2016

A multiple-phenotype imputation method for genetic studies.

Andrew Dahl, Valentina Iotchkova, Amelie Baud, Åsa Johansson, Ulf Gyllensten, Nicole Soranzo, Richard Mott, Andreas Kranis, Jonathan Marchini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Imputing Phenotypes for Genome-wide Association Studies.American journal of human genetics · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Context-specific genetic effects inform endotypes and treatment in asthma.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Choice of phenotype scale is critical in biobank-based G×E tests.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gene-environment interactions in human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. High-dimensional multi-omics measured in controlled conditions are useful for maize platform and field trait predictions.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew DahlWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Valentina IotchkovaHuman Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5057-0210
Amelie BaudEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-0283
Åsa JohanssonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulf GyllenstenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory Uppsala, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nicole SoranzoHuman Genetics, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1095-3852
Richard MottWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andreas KranisAviagen, Ltd., Newbridge, UK.
Jonathan MarchiniWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0610-8322

Funding

European Research Council 617306Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 090532/Z/09/ZWellcome Trust 099680/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic association studies have yielded a wealth of biological discoveries. However, these studies have mostly analyzed one trait and one SNP at a time, thus failing to capture the underlying complexity of the data sets. Joint genotype-phenotype analyses of complex, high-dimensional data sets represent an important way to move beyond simple genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with great potential. The move to high-dimensional phenotypes will raise many new statistical problems. Here we address the central issue of missing phenotypes in studies with any level of relatedness between samples. We propose a multiple-phenotype mixed model and use a computationally efficient variational Bayesian algorithm to fit the model. On a variety of simulated and real data sets from a range of organisms and trait types, we show that our method outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods from the statistics and machine learning literature and can boost signals of association.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAnimals, Outbred StrainsBayes TheoremBlood PlateletsChickensFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideRatsT-LymphocytesTriticum

Identifiers

PMID26901065
PMCPMC4817234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.