Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26900847›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Factors Related to Social Support in Neurological and Mental Disorders.

Kaloyan Kamenov, Maria Cabello, Francisco Félix Caballero, Alarcos Cieza, Carla Sabariego, Alberto Raggi, Marta Anczewska, Tuuli Pitkänen, Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Social, professional and neuropsychiatric outcomes in patients with myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Kaloyan KamenovInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red, CIBER, Madrid, Spain.
Maria CabelloInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red, CIBER, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Félix CaballeroInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red, CIBER, Madrid, Spain.
Alarcos CiezaFaculty of Social and Human Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Carla SabariegoDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology-IBE, Chair for Public Health and Health Services, Research, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Alberto RaggiNeurological Institute "C. Besta" IRCCS Foundation, Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Milan, Italy.
Marta AnczewskaDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Tuuli PitkänenA-Clinic Foundation, Helsinki, Finland.
Jose Luis Ayuso-MateosInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro Investigación Biomédica en Red, CIBER, Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESInstitute of Psychiatry and Neurology · PLLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DERehabilitation Foundation · FIThe Neurological Institute · USUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the huge body of research on social support, literature has been primarily focused on its beneficial role for both physical and mental health. It is still unclear why people with mental and neurological disorders experience low levels of social support. The main objective of this study was to explore what are the strongest factors related to social support and how do they interact with each other in neuropsychiatric disorders. The study used cross-sectional data from 722 persons suffering from dementia, depression, epilepsy, migraine, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, stroke, and substance use disorders. Multiple linear regressions showed that disability was the strongest factor for social support. Extraversion and agreeableness were significant personality variables, but when the interaction terms between personality traits and disability were included, disability remained the only significant variable. Moreover, level of disability mediated the relationship between personality (extraversion and agreeableness) and level of social support. Moderation analysis revealed that people that had mental disorders experienced lower levels of support when being highly disabled compared to people with neurological disorders. Unlike previous literature, focused on increasing social support as the origin of improving disability, this study suggested that interventions improving day-to-day functioning or maladaptive personality styles might also have an effect on the way people perceive social support. Future longitudinal research, however, is warranted to explore causality.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdultAgedComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNervous System DiseasesPersonalityPersons with DisabilitiesRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID26900847
PMCPMC4764676
OpenAlexW2279583050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.