Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26900809›Full record

ReviewTransplantation2016

A Primer on Bayesian Decision Analysis With an Application to a Kidney Transplant Decision.

Richard Neapolitan, Xia Jiang, Daniela P Ladner, Bruce Kaplan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Disease Surveillance Investments and Administration: Limits to Information Value in Pakistan Polio Eradication.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard Neapolitan1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 2 Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 3 Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, Comprehensive Transplant Center (CTC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 4 School for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. 5 Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Xia Jiang
Daniela P Ladner
Bruce Kaplan

Funding

A New Generation Clinical Decision Support SystemR01LM011663 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JIANG, XIA, NEAPOLITAN, RICHARD E · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
Multidimensional Computer Adaptive Testing for Patient Reported OutcomesR01LM011962 · NLM · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI NEAPOLITAN, RICHARD E · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
Detecting Genome Wide Epistasis with Efficient Bayesian Network LearningR00LM010822 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JIANG, XIA · 2012 to 2014
$565k
NLM NIH HHS R00 LM010822NLM NIH HHS R00LM010822NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011663NLM NIH HHS R01LM011663NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011962NLM NIH HHS R01LM011962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A clinical decision support system (CDSS) is a computer program, which is designed to assist health care professionals with decision making tasks. A well-developed CDSS weighs the benefits of therapy versus the cost in terms of loss of quality of life and financial loss and recommends the decision that can be expected to provide maximum overall benefit. This article provides an introduction to developing CDSSs using Bayesian networks, such CDSS can help with the often complex decisions involving transplants. First, we review Bayes theorem in the context of medical decision making. Then, we introduce Bayesian networks, which can model probabilistic relationships among many related variables and are based on Bayes theorem. Next, we discuss influence diagrams, which are Bayesian networks augmented with decision and value nodes and which can be used to develop CDSSs that are able to recommend decisions that maximize the expected utility of the predicted outcomes to the patient. By way of comparison, we examine the benefit and challenges of using the Kidney Donor Risk Index as the sole decision tool. Finally, we develop a schema for an influence diagram that models generalized kidney transplant decisions and show how the influence diagram approach can provide the clinician and the potential transplant recipient with a valuable decision support tool.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision Support TechniquesPatient SelectionAlgorithmsDecision TreesDonor SelectionHumansKidney TransplantationLife ExpectancyRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26900809
PMCPMC4818954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.