Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26900359›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Use of planar kV vs. CBCT in evaluation of setup errors in oesophagus carcinoma radiotherapy.

Liliana Martins, Jose Guilherme Couto, Barbara Barbosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liliana MartinsRadiotherapy Department - Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saude do Porto, Rua Valente Perfeito, 322, 4400-330 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Jose Guilherme CoutoRadiotherapy Department - Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saude do Porto, Rua Valente Perfeito, 322, 4400-330 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal; Radiotherapy Department - Instituto Portugues de Oncologia do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; Radiography Department - Faculty of Health Sciences - University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta.
Barbara BarbosaRadiotherapy Department - Instituto Portugues de Oncologia do Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study is to evaluate differences in terms of the setup errors observed using kV planar image compared to CBCT for oesophageal cancer patients.

backgroundPlanar kV images are quick to acquire but only allow the observation of bony structures. CBCT allows the evaluation of soft tissues, which includes the oesophagus (and tumour) and OAR, giving a more accurate verification of the positioning. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients were imaged with both techniques between January 2012 and March 2014 were included in the study (16 patients, 212 kV images and 116 CBCT images). Differences between the setup errors observed on the two images modalities were studied. A correlation study between TNM staging, tumour location and immobilization systems with setup errors was also done. Finally, the calculation of systematic and random errors allowed to determine the CTV-PTV margin.

resultsA significant discrepancy (p < 0.05) between the setup errors observed with kV and CBCT was observed in the lateral direction. No statistical correlation was found between setup errors and tumour location, immobilization system or TNM staging. The CTV-PTV margin was smaller with CBCT in the vertical (0.6 cm vs. 0.9 cm) and longitudinal (0.7 cm vs. 1 cm) directions and smaller with kV for the lateral directions (0.8 cm vs. 0.9 cm).

conclusionsThe chosen modality influences the setup error observed which will influence the correction applied. Allowing a better observation of the volumes of interest, CBCT should be the modality of choice in this pathology. The CTV-PTV margins could be shrunk if CBCT is used.

Indexed as

CBCTCTV–PTV marginkVOesophagus carcinomaSetup errors

Identifiers

PMID26900359
PMCPMC4716396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.