Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26900329›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene

How can the results of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) evaluations applied to vaccinations be communicated to decision-makers and stakeholders? The ISPOR Rome Chapter Project.

R Gasparini, F S Mennini, D Panatto, P Bonanni, A Bechini, W Ricciardi, C DE Waure, A Marcellusi, A Cicchetti, M Ruggeri and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R GaspariniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy;
F S MenniniFaculty of Economics Centre for Economic and International Studies (CEIS) -Economic Evaluation and HTA (EEHTA), University of Rome, Italy;
D PanattoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy;
P BonanniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy;
A BechiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy;
W RicciardiInstitute of Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy;
C DE WaureInstitute of Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy;
A MarcellusiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy;
A CicchettiInstitute of Health Economics and Management, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
M RuggeriInstitute of Health Economics and Management, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
S BoccaliniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Italy;
University of Florence · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HTA is considered the most comprehensive and transparent method of supporting decision-makers in their choices in Public Health. HTA on vaccines is being performed by many experts. However, they often present their studies to colleagues, but not to decisionmakers, who should be the main target and current users. It is therefore crucial to improve the transfer of scientific data to decision- makers and all stakeholders. The aims of the present project are: 1) to set up a team of experts to collect economic evaluations and HTA studies on vaccines and assess their actual use in decision-making processes; 2) to constitute regional working groups in order to identify the critical aspects of the communication process and identify the most appropriate method of data transfer. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations and HTA on vaccines and their actual use in decision-making will be used to draw up the basic documents for discussion by the 3 regional working boards. The working groups will discuss the current scientific evidence and communication methods and will try to implement a model of technology assessment with well-defined and objective criteria, in order to better fit pharmaco-economic and HTA methods to the field of vaccinations. Improving the transfer of HTA results to stakeholders, particularly decision-makers, will enable decisions to be taken on the basis of scientific evidence, and appropriate, sustainable actions to be undertaken.

Indexed as

HTAPreventionVaccination

Identifiers

PMID26900329
PMCPMC4753815
OpenAlexW2291735568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.