Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26900251›Full record

Trial reportActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2015

Role of bimodal stimulation for auditory-perceptual skills development in children with a unilateral cochlear implant.

P Marsella, S Giannantonio, A Scorpecci, F Pianesi, M Micardi, A Resca

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effect of unilateral and bimodal auditory stimulation on auditory perception and reaction time.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Bilateral cochlear implantation: an assessment of language sub-skills and phoneme recognition in school-aged children.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P MarsellaAudiology-Otology Unit and Cochlear Implant Referral Center, "Bambino Gesù" Pediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy.
S GiannantonioAudiology-Otology Unit and Cochlear Implant Referral Center, "Bambino Gesù" Pediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy.
A ScorpecciAudiology-Otology Unit and Cochlear Implant Referral Center, "Bambino Gesù" Pediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy.
F PianesiAudiology-Otology Unit and Cochlear Implant Referral Center, "Bambino Gesù" Pediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy.
M MicardiAudiology-Otology Unit and Cochlear Implant Referral Center, "Bambino Gesù" Pediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy.
A RescaAudiology-Otology Unit and Cochlear Implant Referral Center, "Bambino Gesù" Pediatric Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a prospective randomised study that evaluated the differences arising from a bimodal stimulation compared to a monaural electrical stimulation in deaf children, particularly in terms of auditory-perceptual skills development. We enrolled 39 children aged 12 to 36 months, suffering from severe-to-profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss with residual hearing on at least one side. All were unilaterally implanted: 21 wore only the cochlear implant (CI) (unilateral CI group), while the other 18 used the CI and a contralateral hearing aid at the same time (bimodal group). They were assessed with a test battery designed to appraise preverbal and verbal auditory-perceptual skills immediately before and 6 and 12 months after implantation. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups at time 0, while at 6 and 12 months children in the bimodal group had better scores in each test than peers in the unilateral CI group. Therefore, although unilateral deafness/hearing does not undermine hearing acuity in normal listening, the simultaneous use of a CI and a contralateral hearing aid (binaural hearing through a bimodal stimulation) provides an advantage in terms of acquisition of auditory-perceptual skills, allowing children to achieve the basic milestones of auditory perception faster and in greater number than children with only one CI. Thus, "keeping awake" the contralateral auditory pathway, albeit not crucial in determining auditory acuity, guarantees benefits compared with the use of the implant alone. These findings provide initial evidence to establish shared guidelines for better rehabilitation of patients undergoing unilateral cochlear implantation, and add more evidence regarding the correct indications for bilateral cochlear implantation.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionCochlear ImplantsCochlear ImplantationFemaleHearing AidsHumansInfantMaleProspective StudiesSpeech PerceptionAuditory-perceptual skillsBimodal stimulationCochlear implantDeaf children

Identifiers

PMID26900251
PMCPMC4755050
OpenAlexW2205586513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.