Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26900202›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary ecology

Social immunity of the family: parental contributions to a public good modulated by brood size.

Ana Duarte, Sheena C Cotter, Catherine E Reavey, Richard J S Ward, Ornela De Gasperin, Rebecca M Kilner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Direct and indirect benefits of cooperation in collective defense against predation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An evolutionary switch from sibling rivalry to sibling cooperation, caused by a sustained loss of parental care.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Defences against brood parasites from a social immunity perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana DuarteDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.
Sheena C CotterSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, MBC, 97 Lisburn Rd, Belfast, BT9 7BL UK ; School of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, Lincolnshire LN6 7TS UK.
Catherine E ReaveySchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, MBC, 97 Lisburn Rd, Belfast, BT9 7BL UK.
Richard J S WardDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.
Ornela De GasperinDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.
Rebecca M KilnerDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.

Funding

European Research Council 310785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social immunity refers to any immune defence that benefits others, besides the individual that mounts the response. Since contributions to social immunity are known to be personally costly, they are contributions to a public good. However, individuals vary in their contributions to this public good and it is unclear why. Here we investigate whether they are responding to contributions made by others with experiments on burying beetle (

Indexed as

AntibacterialGame theoryInsectLysozymeSocial evolutionTrade-off

Identifiers

PMID26900202
PMCPMC4750363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.