Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26899899›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2016

Development and testing of an automated computer tablet-based method for self-testing of high and low contrast near visual acuity in ophthalmic patients.

Tariq M Aslam, Neil R A Parry, Ian J Murray, Mahani Salleh, Caterina Dal Col, Naznin Mirza, Gabriela Czanner, Humza J Tahir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Refinement and preliminary evaluation of two tablet-based tests of real-world visual function.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A world of change in the editorial office.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Android mobile applications in eye care.Oman journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tariq M AslamFaculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Neil R A ParryVision Science Centre, Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Central Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Ian J MurrayVision Science Centre, Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Central Manchester University, Manchester, UK.
Mahani SallehCentre for Hearing and Vision Research, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Caterina Dal ColFaculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Naznin MirzaFaculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Gabriela CzannerDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Eye and Vision Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Humza J TahirFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Room 3.005, Carys Bannister Building, Dover Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. humza.tahir@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GBManchester Royal Eye Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany eye diseases require on-going assessment for optimal management, creating an ever-increasing burden on patients and hospitals that could potentially be reduced through home vision monitoring. However, there is limited evidence for the utility of current applications and devices for this. To address this, we present a new automated, computer tablet-based method for self-testing near visual acuity (VA) for both high and low contrast targets. We report on its reliability and agreement with gold standard measures.

methodsThe Mobile Assessment of Vision by intERactIve Computer (MAVERIC) system consists of a calibrated computer tablet housed in a bespoke viewing chamber. Purpose-built software automatically elicits touch-screen responses from subjects to measure their near VA for either low or high contrast acuity. Near high contrast acuity was measured using both the MAVERIC system and a near Landolt C chart in one eye for 81 patients and low contrast acuity using the MAVERIC system and a 25 % contrast near EDTRS chart in one eye of a separate 95 patients. The MAVERIC near acuity was also retested after 20 min to evaluate repeatability.

resultsRepeatability of both high and low contrast MAVERIC acuity measures, and their agreement with the chart tests, was assessed using the Bland-Altman comparison method. One hundred and seventy-three patients (96 %) completed the self- testing MAVERIC system without formal assistance. The resulting MAVERIC vision demonstrated good repeatability and good agreement with the gold-standard near chart measures.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential utility of the MAVERIC system for patients with ophthalmic disease to self-test their high and low contrast VA. The technique has a high degree of reliability and agreement with gold standard chart based measurements.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldAlgorithmsContrast SensitivityDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSelf CareSoftwareVision DisordersVision TestsVisual AcuityLow contrast acuityPsychophysicsSelf-testingTablet computerVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID26899899
OpenAlexW2287105980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.