Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26899830›Full record

ArticleClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2016

Aspergillus PCR in serum for the diagnosis, follow-up and prognosis of invasive aspergillosis in neutropenic and nonneutropenic patients.

S Imbert, L Gauthier, I Joly, J-Y Brossas, M Uzunov, F Touafek, S Brun, D Mazier, A Datry, F Gay and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Le infezioni in medicina · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Clinical Implementation ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S ImbertService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France.
L GauthierService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France.
I JolyService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France.
J-Y BrossasCentre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, CIMI-Paris, France.
M UzunovService d'Hématologie, AP-HP, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, France.
F TouafekService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France.
S BrunService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France.
D MazierService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France; Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, CIMI-Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France.
A DatryService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France.
F GayService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France.
A FekkarService de Parasitologie Mycologie, France; Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses, CIMI-Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France. Electronic address: arnaud.fekkar@aphp.fr.
Sorbonne Université · FRCentre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the usefulness of a serum Aspergillus PCR assay for the diagnosis and prognosis of invasive aspergillosis in a study involving 941 patients for a total of 5146 serum samples. Fifty-one patients had proven/probable aspergillosis. We compared galactomannan (GM), PCR and mycologic analysis of pulmonary samples in both neutropenic and nonneutropenic patients. PCR performed in serum yielded 66.7% sensitivity, 98.7% specificity, 75.6% positive predictive value and 98.0% negative predictive value, while the GM index yielded 78.4% sensitivity, 87.5% specificity, 27% positive predictive value and 98.6% negative predictive value. The inclusion of PCR in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Mycosis Study Group (MSG) mycologic criteria permitted the reclassification of nine other cases from possible to probable aspergillosis and increased the sensitivity to 71.7%. Combining the GM index with serum PCR increased the detection rate of invasive aspergillosis with 88.2% sensitivity. PCR was systematically negative in 16 patients with noninvasive forms of aspergillosis (namely aspergilloma and chronic aspergillosis). Remaining PCR positive after a period of 14 to 20 days of treatment was related to poor outcome at 30 and 90 days. Our results also indicate that, unlike the determination of the GM index, the initial fungus load as determined by PCR was highly predictive of 90-day mortality, with the rate of the latter being 15.8% for patients with <150 copies/mL vs. 73.2% for patients at or above that cutoff (p <0.0001). Therefore, PCR appears to be a powerful and interesting tool for the identification of patients with invasive aspergillosis who might benefit from more intense care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAspergillusFemaleGalactoseHumansInvasive Pulmonary AspergillosisMaleMannansMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeoplasmsNeutropeniaPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsgalactomannanGalactoseMannansAspergillus fumigatusfungal infectiongalactomannanhaematologysolid organ transplant

Identifiers

PMID26899830
PMCPMC7129605
OpenAlexW2285680122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.